|
|
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - bloodyYOKEL-NZ
1
« on: January 08, 2006, 09:46:50 pm »
well said verrt. Like i said in the first post: game developers dont quit on a profitable idea
I have come to realise that the quality of games is determined by just another personality attribute.
While i was reading the steam forums i have come across alot of trolls who complain about games and cannot appreciate a single good point of anything. But as i compared troll by troll i found that none of them like the same thing, one would say HL2 is the only satasfying game and for good reason. At the same time he will call Far cry crap and cheap and for good reason.
Another will say HL2 was crap and cheap for good reason. while thinking Far Cry had perfect detail for good reason. Not one troll could come to agreement.
This clearly cannot be the fault of the games themselves, its all how people interpret them.
Further evidence comes from the "best games" thread, according to that all games are the best game. This means there is no real "best" game, neither can there be bad games.
Some of you will say Gameplay > Graphics
Some of you will say Physics > Detail
None of us will totaly agree on which is which, it all depends on your induvidual gaming taste.
2
« on: January 04, 2006, 11:26:32 am »
Freelancer was an awesome game online, the best part was that its made for modding.
Almost all tactical data was comprised of easily edited ini files; factions, systems, ships. Everything could be changed. I have created my own weapons, bases etc for that game.
i was one of the first players to join ICONZ FL server, ahh those were good times.
3
« on: January 03, 2006, 05:47:40 pm »
Looks like they rule over Killer as well.
It takes emagination to appreciate emagination.
:edit: if FPS is overused it will eventually bore, then the old RTS, RPG and simulations (once forgotten) will look new and fascinating. They wont die out for as long as gaming veterans will remember them.
4
« on: January 03, 2006, 05:35:11 pm »
Darwinia was crappy looking by intention, its setting is a living civilisation in a virtual world. The makers of the game made it so it actualy looks virtual.
Its one guys emagination of what the world would look like if it was a giant supercomputer.
But if its sexy looking graphics that is the reason why darwinia has poor sales, then we really are as stupid as those fat-cat moneybag "game developers" think we are.
5
« on: December 22, 2005, 07:35:27 pm »
people are starting to post themselves in the photo spam thread.
i think i know why now.
6
« on: December 20, 2005, 03:08:19 pm »
Remember those Gigapets that everyone all wanted and adored back in the 1990's?
They were pulled of the market after peoples pets kept dying in a matter of weeks, after such a bad demostration of quality who would have thought they would return?
They are back again today, exactly the same but under a new name. This time i wasnt attracted by them like i was before, in fact i noticed how lame they were.
However they still selled in the rocket load just like they did before, kids who have never seen them treated them like something new and fascinating.
The toy makers didnt quit on a profitable idea, neither do game designers. Games like BF2 and COD2 may be old ideas, but not to new gamers. And they will have the same affect on new gamers just as they did to you when the FPS genre first came out.
Perhaps its not the games, your simply growing up.
7
« on: December 04, 2005, 06:19:43 pm »
Especially against THIS human. Im not a filthy human you fool, but perhaps being a race that bears similarity to a catnip toy isnt so great either.
8
« on: November 29, 2005, 05:37:44 pm »
Are you happy? you have broke a man.
.
He should be quite pleased. Cats take divine pleasure in cruelty. Especialy this against humans.
9
« on: November 24, 2005, 05:02:09 pm »
until that affect happens. Some people tend to get so involved in sim lifestyle that they begin to control other people around them like they do to the sims.
Unless the 2 people im talking about just have a commanding personality.
10
« on: November 23, 2005, 02:07:16 pm »
You're missing the point
It's not to find the best game there is no such thing, find me the pefect snowflake
The point it to discuss great games and what made them great the title of the thread is a bit misleading. but it would be nice to know anyway which game has the most fans;). it still wont insist that there is a "best" game since all games have enemies too. PS: one of my friends is a control freak because of Sims.
11
« on: November 22, 2005, 05:14:54 pm »
Theres too many opinions on the best game, i dont think there is one.
you may as well pick a variety.
I think half life got the most votes however, but i could be wrong. Counting these nominations is like counting the stars
12
« on: November 13, 2005, 12:38:08 pm »
UT and its sequels are awesome games but its background isnt well put together. Its made to be the best MP game rather than the best SP game, thats probably why noone has mentioned it.
13
« on: November 11, 2005, 02:01:22 pm »
I disagree yokel. hehe i thought you might say that.
14
« on: November 10, 2005, 05:14:51 pm »
Its amazing how black heart earns credit by disagreeing with everybody.
15
« on: November 09, 2005, 04:14:09 pm »
its the sentimental value that gets old games points in the BEST GAME awards.
They may be outdated by 60372 sentences in its system code, but they spanwed first ideas and concepts. They are responsible for the quality of new games we have today. Old gamers owe their respects.
There could be other reasons why we cling to old games.
perhaps we should judge the best game by era:
mid 1980's: Commander keen 1
1990's: Duke nukem 3D
mid 1990's: half life
the Zero's: Freelancer
Mid 2000: Halo 2
16
« on: November 08, 2005, 05:11:45 pm »
So whats the summary of all the games voted to be the best? We need a tally to find out what game just got nominated the most.
17
« on: October 29, 2005, 02:15:46 pm »
babylon 5 never struck my fancy. Perhaps its because i only watched 5 minutes of each episode but it fell to the ranks of startreck; deep space 9. needed more giant ships getting blown to smithereens
18
« on: October 28, 2005, 04:23:16 pm »
But the first one "Dune" is just fantastic - deep and powerful. BY the film is nothing compared to the book.
as i had suspected, i beleive we also have a series of the books packed up above the ceiling somewhere. I only have seen the films. Even then i didnt think the film and its sequels were that bad.
19
« on: October 27, 2005, 05:09:25 pm »
we have the entire film series of dune. indeed If books turn out better than the film then i need to find out where the books are.
20
« on: October 26, 2005, 04:54:23 pm »
Well you have high expectations, when I see a movie I always see better ways things could have been done, but that doesn't mean I don’t like the movie.
no i dont, i did like the movie, i simply felt it could have been done differently, I once watched dragonball Z episodes and old black and white sci-fi flops so i dont mind lame. The fact is that it was. I sure dont listen to maddox, i thought the special effects were very well done.
21
« on: October 25, 2005, 06:11:14 pm »
That picture reminds me...
I found a shootemup internet game featuring jar jar binks. Your objective: shoot every jar jar you see into a bloody mess. I forget where it is but its brilliant. I played it for ages and got the rank of jedi (never missed).
episodes 1 to 3 were kinda lame, no movie should leave me thinking how they could have done it better but i enjoyed them anyway. At least to me the action well compensated for plot, lucas is a shit director maybe but i credit his enginuity for fight scenes. has anyone seen the technical wizardry behind those battles?
Thats my view towards the films, since we all look at it differently i cant argue with anyone else for how they see it
22
« on: October 22, 2005, 04:35:18 pm »
i guess your right.
but its so hard to tell the difference between them however so you have to assume they have no affect on your appearance
23
« on: October 22, 2005, 03:59:46 pm »
Why do you always have to diminish the mood?
Anyone looks good in a stormtrooper suit
24
« on: October 13, 2005, 04:41:21 pm »
killa likes man-tits :bounce:
25
« on: October 12, 2005, 06:17:26 pm »
Bahahahahahaha growler you stud! aint female hormones a wonderful thing?
|
|
|
