|
|
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - mattnz
26
« on: January 31, 2014, 01:46:45 pm »
I still stutter. Nothing has ever worked for me :/
27
« on: January 31, 2014, 01:45:37 pm »
Were these changes in today's update?
28
« on: January 29, 2014, 10:14:57 am »
I think they probably should have kept the same bullet speed for the 20mm AA, just reduced it's TTL to reduce it's range. That change might make the 20mm obsolete.
29
« on: January 28, 2014, 11:16:09 am »
seagate also sell more drives so...so naturally their failure rate for peeps would seem high.
Hitachi,,,make the best drives......if you are really concerned about quality drives.....dont buy sata...and buy only sas at 10K or 15K rpm if not buying ssd.
The process and working components are better as they have to be for the speeds they must support so better quality and drive will last longer.......but will use more power and generate more heat....
anything in the 7k speed space is rubbish...
What are you on dude? Firstly, failure rate is not a function of drives sold. If anything, drives sold would allow a more reliable estimate of failure rate. Not that that has any relevance to the data in the OP. Secondly, the drives in the study were in an always online storage server. This is far from how most consumers will use them. In that setting some power saving functions become a liability, increasing failure rate. And what?! Don't buy SATA?! Only buy SSDs or 10k??? Do you work for a hard drive manufacturer? The simple fact is that a cheap and cheerful 3/4TB will serve the storage needs of 98% of people, the other 2% can get another couple and set up a RAID array.
30
« on: January 28, 2014, 10:50:09 am »
What's wrong with windows backup?
31
« on: January 28, 2014, 10:45:34 am »
Java is a tool. I don't see how people can hate it.
32
« on: January 28, 2014, 10:25:07 am »
^^^Pretty much
Could the page numbers of a thread be at the top and bottom?
Also I notice that tiwa's obsession with titles on posts is now causing those titles (instead of the originals) to show up on the main page when people reply to him. Is this by design?
33
« on: January 28, 2014, 10:21:20 am »
So where do I get the sweet dealz from now? I need 4TB!
34
« on: January 21, 2014, 03:59:26 pm »
Why would you want the information confined to the two ends of the screen? I just use a smaller window, the rest of the screen is for doing other stuff.
35
« on: January 20, 2014, 12:22:55 pm »
Hi, Whenever I see the name of the new site followed by a noun, I feel like I am being imperatively told to acquire multiple instances of that noun, for example Battlefield 3 Server Status here. I don't really know what I would do with even one Battlefield 3 Server Status, and that regular confusion is limiting my full engagement with the new site. Could you please change the name?
36
« on: October 15, 2013, 02:11:24 pm »
It depends on the quality of the speakers though, if they're not up to scratch that's just throwing money away. Also no network and it's stereo.
37
« on: October 15, 2013, 11:14:06 am »
This little fella seems pretty popular, will do the job, also with wifi and the blueteeth. http://pricespy.co.nz/product.php?e=1820289You may also want to measure the impedance of the speakers, to make sure they're not something silly like 4ohms. Use the difference on a half decent set of speakers.
38
« on: October 13, 2013, 08:34:05 pm »
Why can I not see new postssss??
39
« on: October 11, 2013, 01:00:01 pm »
Well mine just updated (again?) and now it's a solid 40-50, so hmmmm.
40
« on: October 11, 2013, 11:00:54 am »
Haha, I dunno. I'm running an X4 955 (with GTX660, 12GB, and SSD), which is below recommended, but I still feel like I should be getting more than a terribly unstable 30fps.
41
« on: October 11, 2013, 09:52:04 am »
Still runs like aids for me :/
42
« on: October 09, 2013, 11:44:02 am »
Wow that lock on ohk from rpgs on the helis is ridiculous.
43
« on: October 08, 2013, 04:47:14 pm »
From the sounds of things you might be just as likely to get gains reinstalling Windows 7.
44
« on: October 08, 2013, 04:46:36 pm »
Invert the controls and lower the sensitivity?
45
« on: October 08, 2013, 03:54:34 pm »
Mouse + kb
46
« on: October 07, 2013, 09:06:56 am »
I'm thinking the "update" will be another map for the last weekend of the beta. As with the bf3 beta and caspian on the last weekend.
Lets crash a destroyer into an island. Hopefully it's a bit less inevitable than the skyscraper collapse.
47
« on: October 04, 2013, 10:04:31 am »
Yep, RPGs are a lot quicker now. Tanks shells are crazy slow though.
Also that tower is way to easy to take down. Pillars should be in a basement, or somewhere defensible.
48
« on: October 03, 2013, 05:38:27 pm »
It is now inexplicably working :|
49
« on: October 03, 2013, 05:23:45 pm »
I rolled back my drivers to try and sort out the fps issues and now it's just stuck on the loading screen :/
50
« on: October 02, 2013, 10:45:26 am »
* Getting 50-60FPS on High @ 1920x1200 with the Battlescreen off. With it on, drops to 25-30FPS. (GTX670, i5 2500k@4ghz)
* Textures in some places are fugly. I wonder if they've used low textures to save space in Beta?
* CPU usage seems a lot higher than BF3 - 90% utilisation
* Lots of lag, a few crashes, but better than I remember the BF3 beta. How does one turn off 'battlescreen'?
|
|
|
