Get Some

General => General Chat => Topic started by: benlav on January 26, 2010, 12:41:52 pm

Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: benlav on January 26, 2010, 12:41:52 pm
if you're keen, sign up and challenge me - benlav

It's simply online chess, but, you don't have to sit infront of a computer for hours on end playing. You might challenge me now, in an hour I make a move, then tomorrow you might make your corresponding move. Game could take a week or so, but you only do it when you have a quick minute. Might get a few moves in a day depending how you play. If you want to do sit down and 100% focus chess, this isn't it.

You can set it up so you get emailed when your opponent moves. It also has a handy iphone specific page (not an app).

So if you are keen, sign up and post your nick here for the world to see.
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Bobyoby on January 26, 2010, 04:10:32 pm
Sounds like a good idea, I might give it a shot.
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 26, 2010, 06:45:03 pm
Heh. I was going to make a system like this as a project a while back... I never got around to it.
Oh well, cool! :)

Interface could use a bit of a spruce up though.
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Munc_her on January 26, 2010, 09:26:56 pm
The battle has begun
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Lone-Star on January 26, 2010, 09:41:01 pm
redhotpawn... ohhh i see what they did there...

lol
Title: Shoobu de kore!
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 26, 2010, 11:45:14 pm
I've signed up as: Tiwaking

I have tried using FICS before, but it kept crapping out during games (against a friend of mine who was on msn)

Edit: Dammit. I cant challenge you. You are playing six games already!

Edit2: Pyromanik. You and me, Birds Opening. lets go

Edit3: Belavs Games (http://www.redhotpawn.com/core/viewpublicgames.php?isminiboard=on&uid=557762)
Pyromanik vs Benlav: Close game, but Benlav is 'winning' here

1. f4 Nf6 2. e3 d5 3. Nc3 e6 4. Be2 c6 5. Nh3

Benlav vs chattychick4nz: Benlav has already won this game. Can you see why?

1. e4 d5 2. f3 dxe4 3. fxe4 e5 4. Nf3 f6

The other games are inconclusive
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: benlav on January 28, 2010, 11:08:25 am
Turns out I'm mr popular!

Will challenge you when i'm allowed to.
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Valvanite on January 28, 2010, 11:38:30 am
Id try it if i knew how to play chess.

something I never learned when i was younger. I had a Master system II
Title: Chess: A fight of ideas not pieces
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 28, 2010, 12:58:52 pm
Quote from: Valvanite;1058030
Id try it if i knew how to play chess.

something I never learned when i was younger. I had a Master system II

My only advice is: Give it a go!

Especially with this website, with the three day move limit you dont even have to care until its your turn to move.

The main problem with chess is that the players and fans arent very good communicators, so learning the game is like having your teeth pulled. Worse if trying to become GOOD at chess, because you hit the old brick wall of: "Great chess players are born, not made"


Chess: The 'Eve online' of board games

Chess attracts a rather large following from huge nerds, why is that?

Because Chess contains one of the biggest nerd draw cards, the 'cat-nip' of the nerd world, the cocaine of the intellectual

Problem Solving

The problem with problem solving is: If you are good at solving problems, you will never go back to them once you have the answer. You will never investigate the methods you used to solve the problem and, when asked, the usual reply is "Meh. I finished that one"


Chess contains the magic '70%/30%' split of Problem-Solving/Choice ratio. This means that 70% of the game is pure problem solving and 30% of the game is actual CHOICE

Okay. Im getting ahead of myself here


Tiwa and the Art of Gaming

Any decision in any game can be reduced to two incentives: PROBLEMS and CHOICES. This is the basics of the basics when it comes to game design

"Whats the difference?", you ask

A PROBLEM is something which has one BEST answer based entirely on what is required: For example "$2 + $2 = ?" is a problem. "There is an ice door in front of you, you have a flame thrower. How will you get through?" is another example of a problem

A CHOICE is similar to a problem, but there is absolutely no clear outcome/both decisions have incomparable value or that either option is fine (for good or for bad). For example "$4 can buy you either 2kg of Bananas or 2kg of Apples". This all comes down to wether or not you like bananas OR apples


Conclusion

Since Chess is 30% choice, this leads to a large and interesting number of variations that can occur. The best chess player on GamerHub (as far as I know) is frog. I may talk the talk but, like in RTS games, I get analysis paralysis


Speaking of which...

Before I do my next move, which wins big. I was pretty sure that Pyromanik was going to kick my arse in our chess game

1. f4 e6 2. e4 Nf6 3. Nc3 Bd6?

Not sure what he was thinking here

4. e5!

OM NOM NOM
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: brucewillis2 on January 28, 2010, 01:13:55 pm
I'm disappointed. the title got me all worked up.
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 28, 2010, 02:13:00 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1057071
I've signed up as: Tiwaking

I have tried using FICS before, but it kept crapping out during games (against a friend of mine who was on msn)

Edit: Dammit. I cant challenge you. You are playing six games already!

Edit2: Pyromanik. You and me, Birds Opening. lets go

Edit3: Belavs Games ([url]http://www.redhotpawn.com/core/viewpublicgames.php?isminiboard=on&uid=557762[/url])
Pyromanik vs Benlav: Close game, but Benlav is 'winning' here

1. f4 Nf6 2. e3 d5 3. Nc3 e6 4. Be2 c6 5. Nh3

Benlav vs chattychick4nz: Benlav has already won this game. Can you see why?

1. e4 d5 2. f3 dxe4 3. fxe4 e5 4. Nf3 f6

The other games are inconclusive


1: We'll see.
2: No I cannot. Can he?

3: Looks like birds opening dominates foolish pyromaniks :(
You say you're not good Tiwa, but you seem to know an aweful lot.

Out of my 3 games, Benlav's is the only one I'm hoping for a shot in. lol.
The other is you, and I can see that going south quick.
And the last is a good mate of mine (aka Bigboss form these here forums), who has pretty much always dominated me, save on the very rare occasion, lol.
Title: Chess aka The Gentlemans way to t-bag someone
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 28, 2010, 03:09:56 pm
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058147
2: No I cannot. Can he?

The thing is, unless BOTH players miss the opportunity (which is unlikely in this case) then you can say that a person is 'winning' or 'losing'. Instead of making good on a threat, you can simply up the ante by threatening something else at the same time.
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058147
3: Looks like birds opening dominates foolish pyromaniks :(
You say you're not good Tiwa, but you seem to know an aweful lot.

Constant hidings from really good players will more or less teach you what you can and cant do. Also, there are some core 'ideas' to chess which, even if you arent a very good player, if you follow them then you'll always have a fighting chance

The 1. f4 Birds Opening is a very hard opening to play, but the ideas behind it are really simple: Control/prevent e5, pawn storm the king side, and protect f2 and h4, which are whites weakest squares.
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058147
1: We'll see.

Quote from: Pyromanik;1058147
Out of my 3 games, Benlav's is the only one I'm hoping for a shot in. lol.

The reason I called Benlav to be 'winning' here (1. f4 Nf6 2. e3 d5 3. Nc3 e6 4. Be2 c6 5. Nh3) is because:

a) Benlav has not castled yet
b) Benlav controls and can control more space
c) The white knight on c3 is hemmed in by your own pieces

Fast forward to NOW:

5. Nh3 Ng4 6. Bxg4 Qh4+ 7. g3 Qd8 8. d4 h5 9. Bf3? e5 10. dxe5

Im going to call it currently Pyromanik is winning, just from material

How to play Chess: A primer

Good chess play consists of understanding two elements:

1) Space. The more places that your pieces can move to safely, the more space you have and therefore the more options your pieces have

2) Time (or Tempo/Tempi). The less moves your opponent can make, the more moves you have 'spare'. To paraphrase an old quote: Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose. You gain time by either forcing your opponent to move (to avoid being eaten) OR making a move which performs more than one action (developing, defending or attacking)

Thusly: If you control the center with your pawns, this prevents the Bishops from attacking a castled king AND forces Knights to move down the sides of the board, which are the worst squares for knights as it deprives them of move options.
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058147
And the last is a good mate of mine (aka Bigboss form these here forums), who has pretty much always dominated me, save on the very rare occasion, lol.

Bigboss? I'll have to keep an eye on that game.

Ouuu! Thats a good looking game you've got there! Big queen side pressure AND a well controlled center. Thats definitely one thats going to be analysed later

As for our game.....um. Yeah :p OM NOM NOM!
Edit:
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058147
2: No I cannot. Can he?

Looks like he couldnt see it. Benlav....

1. e4 d5 2. f3 dxe4 3. fxe4 e5 4. Nf3 f6

The move here is: 5. Nxe4!

if 5. ... fxN then 6. Qh5+!

Black cant block with the pawn because of Qxe4+! Winning the rook in the corner. Black is forced to move his king which ends up being OM NOM NOM time for the white queen
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 28, 2010, 03:20:17 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1058215
Im going to call it currently Pyromanik is winning, just from material

Wouldn't say that.

As for KratosNZ and I... you realise that I'm white, right?


I think a major problem of mine is I play too fast.
Title: Tatakai owari da
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 28, 2010, 03:32:36 pm
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058224
Wouldn't say that.

As for KratosNZ and I... you realise that I'm white, right?

Yes

Look more closely at the situation in your game. Although its not your turn, your weakest square is e4, but you still have the option of d3/d4. Blacks c bishop is sitting there waiting to be attacked by pawns and black hasnt coordinated an attack on your castled king yet

Our game, however, is almost at an end
Title: Congrats Benlav!!
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 28, 2010, 05:22:54 pm
Holy crap Benlav, did you see that Unicorn guys stats?!

Benlav vs Unicorn (http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardhistory.php?gameid=7115654)

Unicorns stats (http://www.redhotpawn.com/profile/playerprofile.php?uid=57803)
Games Played: 6483

I've never played that many games of chess in my entire life. What a huge nerd.

Speaking of nerds, Im going through your game at the moment

Edit:
1. d3

I've had this opening used on me once before and I lost. Its called the Mieses opening and its not used very often

1. ... e5 2. e4 d6

A symmetrical opening. Symmetrical openings rarely favour black

3. Nb1c3 f5

Huge mistake. Blacks f pawn push is premature and does nothing.

4. Nc3d5? f4

Like I said, the f pawn does nothing but hem in the dark sqaures for its own pieces

5. Bc1d2? g5?

Better 5. b3 for a fianchetto. However: All of blacks opening moves have been pawns. Useless pawns at that

6. Qd1h5+ Ke8d7

Benlav puts the boot in

7. Qh5f7+ Bf8e7
8. Ng1f3 c6
9. Nd5b4 c5

9. NxB would have been better here, but black is getting its arse kicked so nothing is bad

10. Nb4d5 Nb8c6 11. g3 Ng8h6

11. Nxg5 would have been better since the bishop is pinned so cant take the knight

12. Qf7g7 Nh6f5??

Obvious blunder. OM NOM NOM

13. exf5 Qd8g8 14. Nd5f6 Kd7c7

Cruel. Cruel

15. Nf6xg8 Bc8xf5 16. Qg7xh8 b6

I would have resigned at move 13. Queen goes OM NOM NOM

17. Qh8g7 Ra8f8 18. Ng8xe7 Bf5d7 19. Qg7xf8 Nc6xe7 20. Qf8xe7 1-0

Man, what a thrashing
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 28, 2010, 06:51:16 pm
Hah! man that guy's really bad for someone with that many games and a paid subscription...


Oh.
"prefer to play quickly."
I'd have though that they'd take it a little more serious after paying money...
Title: Please note: Endgames are my weakness
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 28, 2010, 07:58:19 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1058245
Our game, however, is almost at an end

I spoke too soon about our game! You're putting up a hell of a fight
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058446
Hah! man that guy's really bad for someone with that many games and a paid subscription...


Oh.
"prefer to play quickly."
I'd have though that they'd take it a little more serious after paying money...

Plus there is a difference between 'prefer to play quickly' and 'prefer to play well'

He should stick to Blitz
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 28, 2010, 08:04:12 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1058507
I spoke too soon about our game! You're putting up a hell of a fight

Plus there is a difference between 'prefer to play quickly' and 'prefer to play well'

He should stick to Blitz

1: yes, I can be a prick like that.

2: that's what I meant. Quick does not often mean well, unless a pro trains himself especially for it or something.
I tend to do the same thing when I feel bored or threateningly outclassed. But that's more of a "just get it overwith" attitude.
Title: Tense ending
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 28, 2010, 08:32:05 pm
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058514
I tend to do the same thing when I feel bored or threateningly outclassed. But that's more of a "just get it overwith" attitude.

Good game Pyromanik!

Shit. That was too close. Am doing the analysis now
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: nz_wing on January 28, 2010, 08:41:38 pm
Anyone keen for a game now?
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Ngati_Grim on January 28, 2010, 08:45:55 pm
I love chess but fear this would be another distraction.

My main issue is I play intuitively and prefer not to 'over-analise' moves...both a strength and a weakness!
Title: Chess is like Counterstrike
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 28, 2010, 09:04:11 pm
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058514
1: yes, I can be a prick like that

1. f4 e6

I've never seent this response before, so I went with the 'Smother' approach of f4, e4, d4

2. e4 Ng8f6

3. d3 would smother my queenside play here so I just developed a piece

3. Nb1c3 Bf8d6?

Never put bishops in front of center pawns. Also: Be aware that when there are two pieces together like that, they can get pawn forked like so


4. e5 O-O

4. ... Bxe5 probably would have been the best option. Since the one idea of the birds opening is to pawn storm the kingside, castling king side early is a bad idea

5. exf6 gxf6?

5. ... Qxf6 was the best response. Castling kingside with now no pawns to protect the king and an angry, angry Queen coming hunting is a bad idea

6. Qd1g4+ Kg8h8 7. d4 f5

Smother attack complete: f4, e4, d4. Queen has to retreat though

8. Qg4h3 Nb8c6

In three moves it will be checkmate: Nf3, Ng5, QxP++

9. Ng1f3 f6!

This was an excellent block to Ng5. The right move at the right time

10. Bf1d3 Nc6b4

The bishop is pointing down the white diagonal. My idea was to sacrifice my way into attacking the h7 pawn. Nb4 always threatens the good old Nxc2+ King/Rook fork, but there really isnt any time for black to play that

11. Nc3e4!? Nb4xB

You chose the right move.

11. ... f4xN 12. Bxe4, which lets me keep my bishop and threatens mate in 1 unless f5, Rf7 or Qe7 is played

Its always good to keep your bishop pair and take away your opponents

The other move I was considering for here (which is where the fun began) was 11. Nh4! because of 12. Ng6+ which forks the King and rook (the pawn cant take the knight, its pinned by the queen)

12. cxd3 Bd6b4!?

This was a fun move!! I couldnt figure out the best response so thought "What the hell. We'll just eat each others pieces until one of us gives up"

13. Bc1d2 fxe4 14. Bd2xb4 exf3 15. Bb4xf8 Qd8xf8 16. gxf3 b6

This is one messed up position. However: Your bishop is pretty much stuck forever. Although I have two sets of doubled pawns, they are CENTER pawns meaning that unless you can free FILES to my king, you cant attack him with your pieces. The black Queen is actually pinned to the g7 square

17. Qh3g3 Qf8b4+ 18. Ke1e2 Qb4xd4

You cant actually eat any of my pieces. 18. ... Qxb2+ and I run to the safety of e3

19. Rh1g1 Bc8a6

One move away from checkmating me!

20. Qg3g7 1-0

Queen + Rook cannon is too big a weapon to stop
Quote from: Ngati_Grim;1058547
I love chess but fear this would be another distraction.

My main issue is I play intuitively and prefer not to 'over-analise' moves...both a strength and a weakness!

Its called "analysis paralysis" and happens in almost every game.

A good way to play chess is to think of it as something more familiar. Like.....hmmm....I dunno. Counter-strike


Chess is Counterstrike? Are you high?

Think of it this way: 5  v 5 on that accursed de_dust2. Terrorists move first. If one T 'guards' *cough* AWPS *cough* mid, he can warn the rest of the team how many defenders are going to B, or if any of them are rushing lower tunnels

This is the same as playing e4. Its safe and leaves open plenty of options for White

Playing f4 is like rushing long A. If you dont bring smokes and flashbangs then you're liable to get owned

Playing d4 is like rushing bombsite B. You can go in quickly, hold in the tunnels, run through lowers-mid-b, etc
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Ngati_Grim on January 28, 2010, 09:12:52 pm
lol I'm fucked then.
Title: ARGH! NOOOO!
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 28, 2010, 09:24:07 pm
edit:
Quote from: nz_wing;1058543
Anyone keen for a game now?

A search for nz_wing comes up blank. What is your username?
Quote from: Ngati_Grim;1058592
lol I'm fucked then.

Make up your own opening strategy then. Or camp spawn :P (its called 'The Hedgehog' when you do that)/edit
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058224
Wouldn't say that.

As for KratosNZ and I... you realise that I'm white, right?


I think a major problem of mine is I play too fast.

So I was watching that game (http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardhistory.php?gameid=7115962) with interest and then it went to pieces!

11. bxa5?

WHY?! WHY?!

You're not using your pawns right! Pawns arent battering rams used to eat anything nearby, they're place-holders. Place holders!

Use them to deny opponent spaces, threaten pieces or as sacrifices to win

11. b5 would have reamed BigBoss's position


....live, you learn I suppose
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 28, 2010, 09:39:12 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1058604
edit:

A search for nz_wing comes up blank. What is your username?

Make up your own opening strategy then. Or camp spawn :P (its called 'The Hedgehog' when you do that)/edit

So I was watching that game ([url]http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardhistory.php?gameid=7115962[/url]) with interest and then it went to pieces!

11. bxa5?

WHY?! WHY?!

You're not using your pawns right! Pawns arent battering rams used to eat anything nearby, they're place-holders. Place holders!

Use them to deny opponent spaces, threaten pieces or as sacrifices to win

11. b5 would have reamed BigBoss's position


....live, you learn I suppose


No, not really.
This is pretty much how it always goes down. Right back to when we were kids, hahahaha
Why? Why: because the faster I play, the shitter I get.
I didn't see the queen lurking in the shadows :(
And I use pawns like that because they get in the way of the bigger pieces... never learnt a lesson I guess. I tend to move them when I don't want to move any other pieces... which apparently is often. But thanks for the tip, I shall keep that in mind from now on :)

Hindsight is a wonderful thing.
Like if I'd 19. f5 in our game... maybe... just maybe... (I hope I used that notation correctly?)
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Ngati_Grim on January 28, 2010, 09:41:40 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1058604
Make up your own opening strategy then. Or camp spawn :P (its called 'The Hedgehog' when you do that)/edit


Oh I have a few. I might have a look over the weekend... it'll be the new 'BF2BC' for me!
Title: How to analyse a game
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 28, 2010, 10:09:43 pm
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058616
No, not really.
This is pretty much how it always goes down. Right back to when we were kids, hahahaha
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058616
Why? Why: because the faster I play, the shitter I get.

Then you should try a game where you play as fast as you can and see the result. A one or two minute blitz is good for this. It will also show your worst play which is good because then you have something to compare all your later games with.

One and two minute blitz games, for humans, are impossible to play perfectly. Which is why people play them, because it stops being about what moves you make and more about what ideas/patterns you can recognise quickly.

“In speed chess it is easier to attack with a
piece less, than to defend with an extra piece.”
-- Mikhail Tal
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058616
And I use pawns like that because they get in the way of the bigger pieces... never learnt a lesson I guess.

If your own pieces get in the way of your plans, move them or sacrifice them
"Some sacrifices are sound; the rest are mine" -- Mikhail Tal
Quote from: Ngati_Grim;1058547
My main issue is I play intuitively and prefer not to 'over-analise' moves...both a strength and a weakness!

I was having a think about this one. I've uploaded a picture of four of benlavs games. Not meaning to pick on you or anything benlav, its just that you had the most complete games

Just judging with gut instinct:

Pyromanik vs Benlav: I'd resign as white. Its a lost position

Benlav vs Muncher: Muncher is the chess player that I hate to play against. He's safe meaning he'd capitalise on any mistakes I'd make. However: Benlav is winning here. He just has too much space to maneuver, that knight on e5 is far too solid to shift. Even if its threatened, Benlav can defend it with the other knight

chattychick vs benlav: chattychick isnt doing too badly here. White is a move behind, but has alot of options still. Benlav is trying to capitalise on the queenside, but he need not push himself. Develop and wait-and-see

benlav vs chattychick: White is winning by half a move, but its inconclusive
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 28, 2010, 10:24:04 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1058641
Pyromanik vs Benlav: I'd resign as white. Its a lost position


Yeh, probably a good call. But I'm a never say die kinda guy, haha.
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Ngati_Grim on January 28, 2010, 11:01:18 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1058641

Pyromanik vs Benlav: I'd resign as white. Its a lost position


Quote from: Pyromanik;1058654
Yeh, probably a good call. But I'm a never say die kinda guy, haha.


Death or glory. Never Surrender! It's how I play too.

Games over the weekend?
Title: Pyromanik vs BigBoss: Close, but no cigar
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 28, 2010, 11:35:18 pm
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058654
Yeh, probably a good call. But I'm a never say die kinda guy, haha.

1. Ng1f3 Nb8c6 2. e3 Ng8f6 3. Bf1e2 e5

Okay this is a very weird opening. 3. Bb5 should be played to prevent e5, plus its just a good idea as it develops the bishop to a good square

4. O-O Bf8c5

5. d4 straight away. 5. ... pxp 6. pxp Nxp 7. NxN BxN 8. QxB is a winning exchange for white because the central white queen cant be threatened straight away

5. h3? d5

Never play h3 if you castle kingside. It weakens the pawns protecting the king

6. c3 e4?

This is played far too early. Worse: 7. Nh2 is actually a very good move to play here

7. Nf3h4 g5

Pff. Is that all he's got? An impotent threat or your knight? Threaten something of his

8. d4 Bc5b6

You got lucky in this case pyromanik: d4 is easily countered with 8. d4 exd4 en passant. Im guessing BigBoss doesnt know the en passant rule though. The best move here was 8. b4 attacking his bishop and gaining more space and then more time (if you want) by playing b5

9. b4 gxh4 10. a4 a5?

Nice. a4 is known as the 'Noahs Ark trap' because it is so old. a5 means the bishop has nowhere to go. Things fall down after this point though

11. bxa5? Bb6xa5

Now white is in a world of trouble. There isnt alot of chances for counterplay on the queenside other than something like Nd2, Nb3 to attack the bishop on a5. The a file is half open, meaning his rook can threaten to gobble up some pieces

12. Bc1d2 Nc6e7
13. c4 dxc4 14. Bd2xa5 Ra8xa5 15. Be2xc4 c6

Nd2, Nb3 is needed here to eat his rook

16. f3? b5

Black is under no pressure to exchange pawns so ignores it

17. Bc4e2 bxa4

Black eats up free material

18. Qd1e1 Ne7d5

White is pretty much out of options now. Black has a passed pawn on the queenside, a piece and a pawn majority, fully active pieces and is attacking everything in sight

19. Qe1xh4 Nd5xe3 20. Qh4xf6 Qd8xf6

I would have resigned at this point, but the game limps on

21. Rf1c1 Qf6g7 22. Kg1f2 Qg7xd4 23. Ra1a3 Ne3c2 24. Kf2g3 Rh8g8 25. Kg3h2 Nc2xa3
26. Nb1xa3 Qd4b2 27. fxe4 Qb2xe2 28. Na3c4 Qe2xg2 0-1

I seriously think if you were to put more pressure on BigBoss, his game would definitely collapse.

In fact: Im going to challenge him myself

Incidentally: Anaraith is a member of the chess site

Click me if you are a huge chess nerd (http://www.chessedinburgh.co.uk/chandlerarticle.php?ChandID=340)
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: benlav on January 29, 2010, 10:11:42 am
seriously T, wow... just wow.

How do you know all that? Is all a bit serious for me! I didn't know chess could be analysed in so much detail. Now I'm all self conscious about my moves. I just do what seems right! I play about 3 moves ahead and figure out the rest as I go...
Title: Smashed BigBoss
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 29, 2010, 12:39:43 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1058709
I seriously think if you were to put more pressure on BigBoss, his game would definitely collapse.

In fact: Im going to challenge him myself

Smashed him. Game is as follows:

1. f4 Ng8f6 2. Nb1c3 Nb8c6

No bad moves yet, but black isnt challenging me for the center. I was considering playing e4, but there is no hurry

3. e3 e5

The reason you play 1. f4 isnt to threaten the e5 pawn. It is because you WILL eat the e5 pawn if e5 is played

4. fxe5 Nc6xe5 5. Ng1f3 Ne5xf3

This plays right into the Birds Opening. You can quickly develop the knight, attack a piece and if you lose your knight then the queen is in play on turn six

6. Qd1xf3 Ra8b8

Although BigBoss is planning to use his white square bishop (I am attacking his pawn with my queen), its not going to take any part in this game

7. Bf1c4 c6

The f2 and f7 squares are the weakest squares on the board. Not only does Bc4 guard the d5 square, it also threatens f7. Game is over if you hit f7 with your queen

8. e4 b5 9. Bb3 d5

Im trying to stop him playing d5, which would totally free his position. Instead he attacks on the wings with b5. I run my bishop away. He plays d5, which is a bad move as I am under no obligation to take his pawn and he CANNOT take mine

10. O-O

The queen+rook cannon on the f-file. The only thing guarding the f-file is blacks knight

10. ... Bc8a6 11. exd5

"FUCK!", is what I thought after playing this. Its the wrong move. The move needed here is: e5! Which gains a piece. The knight cant move because of Qxf7++

11. ... Bc5+

Too little, too late. he gains a move, but he's too far behind

12. Kg1h1 cxd5 13. Nc3xd5 Nf6xd5 14. Bb3xd5

"FUCK!!" AGAIN, Qxf7++. I got caught up eating all his pieces

15. ... Qf6

He finally blocks the f-file, but its too late. All I have to do is check the king because his queen is under attack by the rook on f1 and has to move to block

15. Qf3e4+ Qf6e7 16. Bd5xf7+ Ke8f8?

This the losing move. The king is running straight into my rooks attack

17. Bg6+ (discovered check) Kf8g8

Shoving the king into the corner before putting the final bullet in

18. Qd5+ resigns1-0

A very pretty end

That game took about 20mins. If I wasnt being so hasty, I probably would have played Qxf7++

He's challenged me with 1. Nf3. This should be fun!
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Munc_her on January 29, 2010, 01:27:57 pm
FIRST BLOOD
Title: The Crab? LOL!
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 29, 2010, 01:39:02 pm
Quote from: Munc_her;1059103
FIRST BLOOD

OMG The Crab!!
cesarmarte vs Muncher (http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardhistory.php?gameid=7116550)
1. e4 a5 2. d4 h5

I hope you win this one Muncher!! Never underestimate the powah....of the CRAB!!!
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Munc_her on January 29, 2010, 04:21:07 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1059118
OMG The Crab!!
cesarmarte vs Muncher ([url]http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardhistory.php?gameid=7116550[/url])
1. e4 a5 2. d4 h5

I hope you win this one Muncher!! Never underestimate the powah....of the CRAB!!!


Tactics 101..

but really what is crab
Title: The Crab Opening
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 29, 2010, 04:59:00 pm
Quote from: Munc_her;1059246
Tactics 101..

but really what is crab

The Crab Opening is a chess opening characterised by pawns on a4/a5 and h4/h5. Usually played by white, since they move first and essentially have a 'spare' move.

Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ware_Opening) has this to say about it:
Quote from: Wikipedia
Crab Variation, which continues 1... e5 2. h4. This does nothing to help White, but instead weakens his position even more.

It is called the 'Crab Variation' because it looks like a crab (pictured below)
Title: BigBoss vs Tiwaking (Incomplete)
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 30, 2010, 09:54:31 am
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1059042
He's challenged me with 1. Nf3. This should be fun!

BigBoss

I usually dont to incomplete game analysis, but Im really being pressured here and am rapidly running out of ideas

1. Nf3 e6

Nf3 is a unusual but good and flexible 'wait and see' opening. It stops blacks e5. I went with e6 because, like Nf3, it is a 'wait and see' type of opening. It opens up the diagnals for the Queen and Bishop and doesnt commit the e pawn to any form of attack or defence

I was expecting a d4 Queens Pawn Opening where I could transpose into the Nimzo-indian, (Nf3, e6, Bb4, BxN). However BigBoss played:

2. e3 c5

Righty. Im going to force him into a Sicilian style opening, which is bad for me because Im not very good with it. The Sicilian Opening is characterised by 1. e4 c5.

I dont know why it is called that, but I always think of it being like a knife stabbing sideways from the Queenside to the Kingside. Maybe Sicilians like to stab people. I'll ask the Cosa Nostra if I see them

3. b3 Nb8c6

BigBoss wants to develop his bishop and I want to develop my knight

4. d4 a6

I dont know why, but I feel that d4 is abit early. I dont want to take that pawn plus if he takes my pawn then I get to develop my bishop for free. Im going to take away the option of playing Bb5 (which attacks my Knight) by playing my a pawn up

5. Ba3 Qa5+

Im not sure if Ba3 deserves a ? (which denotes a bad move). Its a very interesting move which attacks my c pawn again, but I thought his idea was to play Bb2 to develop. I throw out a check because it protects my c pawn

Im praying that he doesnt block with is Queen because Im sure Im forced to exchange. I dont do very well without my Queen (peyow peyow!)

6. c3 b5

Thank goodness he didnt block with his Queen. Now Im going to pawn storm the queenside

7. b4 cxb4

Im not sure if b4 deserves a ?. It seems....very weird since I gain a pawn out of it, unless Im missing something. Oh well. OM NOM NOM


The final postion is below
Title: How to play chess: Chess Miniatures
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 30, 2010, 02:15:22 pm
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058616
Like if I'd 19. f5 in our game... maybe... just maybe... (I hope I used that notation correctly?)

20. Qf8++. A good try though
Quote from: benlav;1058893
seriously T, wow... just wow.

How do you know all that? Is all a bit serious for me! I didn't know chess could be analysed in so much detail. Now I'm all self conscious about my moves. I just do what seems right! I play about 3 moves ahead and figure out the rest as I go...

In my second game against BigBoss Im totally lost and out of ideas. Thats the limit of my 'move sight' or whatever you call it. I try to play either a POSITION or IDEA, an example of which I shall give below:

From the Tiwaking vs Pyromanik game

The picture at the bottom shows the board after the move 5. ... gxf6

The picture on the left is of the whole board whereas the right picture is what I am seeing ("God save our gracious Queen...")

As you can see, I've effectively cut the board in half because nothing on the left side of the board is going to have any effect on the other. All I'd need is a horsey or a rook to give QEII a hand and it would be game over

As soon as Pyromanik played 'f6', it blocked off too many squares in that half which forced me to draw in reinforcements, which re-involved the left side of the board into the game


I hope this has been some help. This thread is turning into my personal Chess blog though, mainly because I never got taught how to play chess 'properly' and think its a damn shame since its not that hard.

Its like learning to play BF2 after BF1942
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 30, 2010, 05:25:13 pm
Quote from: benlav;1058893
seriously T, wow... just wow.

How do you know all that? Is all a bit serious for me! I didn't know chess could be analysed in so much detail. Now I'm all self conscious about my moves. I just do what seems right! I play about 3 moves ahead and figure out the rest as I go...

Same as me bro... Which reminds me... lol.

*a wee while later*

Just fucked my checkmate on benlav. Stupid impulse moves ><
FFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
gg benlav.
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Munc_her on January 30, 2010, 07:35:03 pm
Holey shit T... holey shit
Title: Victory is mine!
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 30, 2010, 07:35:43 pm
Quote from: Munc_her;1059103
FIRST BLOOD

Muncher...

Shortest game EVAR!

I thought I'd try something fun by sacrificing my e pawn

7 moves later. Wow. Just....wow
Quote from: Pyromanik;1060067
Same as me bro... Which reminds me... lol.

*a wee while later*

Just fucked my checkmate on benlav. Stupid impulse moves ><
FFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

I also saw you lost BOTH games to BigBoss!

Edit:
Quote from: Munc_her;1060132
Holey shit T... holey shit

Yeah Im laughing pretty hard at that game

1. d4 Nf6

I absolutely hate queen pawn openings

2. Nd2 e5

I thought I'd try something different by offering you a free pawn

3. dxe5 Ng4

I want my pawn back

4. b4 Bf8xb4

Ouu a free pawn! OM NOM NOM

5. c3 Bc5

Threat is: BxP++

6. Qb3 (makes room for the king to run) Bc5xf2+
7. Kd1 Ne3++ 0-1

Bwaahahahaha
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 30, 2010, 07:51:09 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1060133
I also saw you lost BOTH games to BigBoss!


Yeh, as I say, it's pretty normal when we play.
Doesn't help that we were playing quite fast the second time.
Title: BigBoss vs Pyromanik
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 31, 2010, 09:26:35 pm
Quote from: Pyromanik;1060138
Yeh, as I say, it's pretty normal when we play.
Doesn't help that we were playing quite fast the second time.

1. e4 d5 2. Nc3? Nf6

e4 d5 is the Scandanavian opening. You're are meant to eat blacks pawn here or suffer an uncomfortable game

2. Nge2? Nbd2?

Two truly awful moves. Nbd2 blocks your queen from defending the pawn. Nge2 just doesnt do anything at all

3. exd5 b6 4. g3? g6?

I thought your plan was to play Bb7? You really shouldnt change your plans like that

5. Bg2 Ba6? 6. d6 cxd6 7. BxR QxB

KratosNZ goes OM NOM NOM

8. Rg1 Qf3

Funny. BigBoss obviously doesnt know the castling rules. You can castle if your rook is under attack. He didnt have to move his rook out of the line of fire

9. Nd4 Qg4 10. QxQ NxQ - KratosNZ has too big a material advantage and benefits by trading pieces

11. h3 Ne5 12. g4 Nc4?

Please stop moving the Knight. You've moved it enough this game. You've still got a bishop down the back waiting to do something!

13. d3 Ne5 14. f4 Bg7? 15. PxN (OM NOM NOM) Bxe5 16. Nc6 Bxc3 17. bxc3 0-0? 18. Nxe7+ Kg7 19. Bb2 Bb7 20. c4+ f6 21. Nd5 Ne5?

You could have played: 21. ... Re8+ here. You should always throw out a check, if only to be annoying

22. g5? Nf3+!

Even though you keep losing, you two are very well matched

23. Kf2 NxR 24. gxf6+

An exceptionally weird situation. Very rare you see a pinned pawn capturing and threatening checkmate

24. ... Kf7 (avoids the Knight check on g8 and Bishop check on h8) 25. RxN Bxd5

This game is effectively over. White has a protected passed pawn (f6) and an extra piece. It drags on for an astounding 23 more moves!

26. Ra1xg1 Bb7xd5
27. cxd5 a5 28. a4 Rf8c8 29. Rg1c1 Rc8c5 30. c4 h5 31. Bb2d4 Rc5c8
32. Bd4xb6 Rc8b8 33. Bb6xa5 Rb8b2 34. Kf2e3 Rb2h2 35. Ba5c7 Rh2xh3
36. Ke3d4 Kf7e8 37. a5 Ke8d7 38. Bc7b8 Rh3h2 39. Rc1a1 Rh2b2 40. Bb8a7 Rb2b7
41. f7 Rb7xa7 42. f8=Q Ra7c7 43. Qf8g7 Kd7c8 44. Qg7f8 Kc8b7 45. Ra1b1 Kb7a6
46. Qf8a8 Rc7a7 47. Qa8c6 Ka6xa5 48. Qc6b5++ 1-0
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 31, 2010, 11:19:32 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1060799
Funny. BigBoss obviously doesnt know the castling rules. You can castle if your rook is under attack. He didnt have to move his rook out of the line of fire

He pretty much never castles.
He's not in the habit of it, so he never remembers that can.
Title: Om nom nom! Uncastled King! OM NOM NOM!
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 31, 2010, 11:31:46 pm
Quote from: Pyromanik;1060850
He pretty much never castles.
He's not in the habit of it, so he never remembers that can.

Hey thanks for that!

I was wondering the my game was going to go. If he doesnt remember that he can castle, then our game is going to be over very very soon!
Title: BigBoss vs Tiwaking (Complete)
Post by: Tiwaking! on February 03, 2010, 03:31:14 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1059859
This is the previous post which must be read  for this one to make sense

That was one of the toughest games I've ever had and it all ends with a blunder by BigBoss :(

This analysis is quite deep because Im still not 100% sure about this game. The whole thing wasnt very clear
(http://forums.gamerhub.co.nz/attachment.php?attachmentid=17728&stc=1&d=1264798466)
9. cxb4 Bxb4+

This was to force the bishop to exchange and this is how I win a pawn

10. Bxb4 Nxb4

This is a common trick, to play Nc2 check and fork the king and rook. In this case, with Queen behind it, I am threatening Nc2 double check from both the Knight and the Queen which wins the rook as the king MUST move

11. Ne5

Of all the options, I believe this to be quite weak. It ends up in an interesting situation, but Nbd2 was probably a better idea, blocking the dark square diagonal to the king preventing check

11. ... d6

I am not happy with this move. Sure it threatens to eat his knight, but his knight isnt hurting anyone sitting there

12. h3 Nc2 dbl check

Tit for tat. I threaten his knight, he threatens mine. But I was going to move mine anyway. His king is forced to the only square available

13. Ke2 NxR 14. Nc6 Qc7

Nc6 was a great move. It gets his knight out of trouble and threatens my Queen. Since its being so annoying, I threaten to eat it

15. Nb4 Bb7

I feel 13. e5 is actually a better move for white here. I cant actually eat the pawn as I get into dire straits after QxP. Since my development is lacking, I throw the bishop out and am looking to put my rook on the c-file to support my queen

15. Nd2 Qc3

White threatens to eat my Knight by opening up the rank. I do the only move which can save it

16. Ne4?? Bxe4 17. Resigns 0-1

Noooo! Any move would have been fine here! Ne3, Nb1, Ke1, anything but that one! His move simply loses his Knight for no reason

A disappointing end. Even though BigBoss was material down, he definitely had good chances in the endgame
Title: Previously on the Chess thread...
Post by: Tiwaking! on February 05, 2010, 09:19:41 pm
Quote from: Pyromanik;1056904
Heh. I was going to make a system like this as a project a while back... I never got around to it.
Oh well, cool! :)

Interface could use a bit of a spruce up though.

Interface is fine. But the update system needs a kick as it sometimes emails you an HOUR after the opponent has moved, and the 'wait for this game' isnt too reliable
Quote from: Pyromanik;1058654
Yeh, probably a good call. But I'm a never say die kinda guy, haha.

Quote from: Tiwaking!;1059118
OMG The Crab!!
cesarmarte vs Muncher ([url]http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardhistory.php?gameid=7116550[/url])
1. e4 a5 2. d4 h5

I hope you win this one Muncher!! Never underestimate the powah....of the CRAB!!!

KratosNZ vs Pyromanik (http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardhistory.php?gameid=7142611)

Another Crab game!!


p.s The Crab is a pretty bad opening. You should avoid it. Everyone: I urge you not to get any more crabs!
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on February 05, 2010, 10:21:47 pm
I love you tiwa <3
But I'm a sucker for unorthodox shit. I'm a see how this goes. Gonna modify it a bit though, get some real pincer shit going on if I can. maybe.


Also, big ups to benlav for accepting the draw. That shit was going ON and ON and ON, lmao!
Intense though bro, enjoyed it!
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: benlav on February 07, 2010, 08:26:09 pm
Yeah good game pyro and muncher.

No worries on the draw, if we were face to face I would have played it out a little longer. But usually those final moves are quick and repeatative, like you said, could have taken days and then probably still would have been a draw.  

T, ??? You resigned? I couldn't help but notice either you were trying to bait me into position by claiming some of your pieces, or you were having an off game? Either way, I was convinced (rightly so I think) that you were wanting me to claim those pieces so it fulfilled your plan... Still, why'd you resign?
Title: Got my butt kicked
Post by: Tiwaking! on February 07, 2010, 08:38:38 pm
Quote from: benlav;1065094
T, ??? You resigned? I couldn't help but notice either you were trying to bait me into position by claiming some of your pieces, or you were having an off game? Either way, I was convinced (rightly so I think) that you were wanting me to claim those pieces so it fulfilled your plan... Still, why'd you resign?

I frickin messed up BAD in our game. I completely forgot that there was a bishop there! And yes: I was trying to bait you, but I buggered up big time (shown below)

1. d3 e5 2. e4 f5 3. f3 Nf6 4. g4 Bc5 5. gxf5 Nh5 6. Qd2 Qh4 7. Kd1 Nf4 8. Qc3 Ng2?? 9. Qxe5+ Be7 10. Bf1xg2 1-0

Move 8 was MEANT to be: 8. ... d6

Had to resign: Two pawns and a piece down and staring down the barrel of a three move checkmate! Good Game. You outplayed me :D
Quote from: Pyromanik;1064328
I love you tiwa <3

I think Im going down in this game too :\
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: benlav on February 07, 2010, 08:52:36 pm
T you show me too much respect. Even without those pieces you still would have outplayed me!

I also just cocked up a move. Pawn meant to go to g3, not g4. Caused me a few problems.
Title: One more: You. Me. Lets go!
Post by: Tiwaking! on February 07, 2010, 09:01:01 pm
Quote from: benlav;1065114
T you show me too much respect. Even without those pieces you still would have outplayed me!

I also just cocked up a move. Pawn meant to go to g3, not g4. Caused me a few problems.

Crikeys! You did exactly what I just did in the previous game!

That was a short, but very instructive game!

1. e3 e5 2. f4 e4 3. g3 d5 4. g4 Qh4+ 5. Ke2 Bxg4+ 6. Nf3 Bxf3++ 0-1

Round three: FIGHT!
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: benlav on February 07, 2010, 09:03:53 pm
Game on! Evens out the last one.
Title: I cant believe I broke out of that stranglehold!
Post by: Tiwaking! on February 07, 2010, 10:52:37 pm
Quote from: benlav;1065119
Game on! Evens out the last one.

You threw away a win benlav!!

Threw away a win!

18. Nd5?

You didnt have to play Nd5! I was already heavily sweating under the combined efforts of your bishop and pawn

That. Was an intense game!

Good Game and Good Night :)

(Game is spoilered)
1. Nb1c3 e5 2. Ng1f3 Nb8c6 3. e4 Bf8c5 4. Bf1c4 Ng8f6 5. Nf3g5 O-O
6. d3 h6 7. Ng5f3 d6 8. h3 Nc6a5 9. g4 Na5xc4 10. dxc4 Bc8e6 11. g5 hxg5
12. Bc1xg5 Be6xc4 13. Rh1g1 g6 14. h4 Qd8e7 15. h5 Qe7e6 16. h6 Kg8h7
17. b3 Bc4a6 18. Nc3d5 Nf6xd5 19. exd5 Bc5b4 20. Nf3d2 Qe6xd5 21. Rg1g3 Qd5h1
22. Rg3g1 Qh1xg1 0-1
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on February 07, 2010, 11:13:30 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1065107
I think Im going down in this game too :\


Hah, don't think so.
Looks like you've got me on the ropes already :/
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: benlav on February 08, 2010, 06:25:49 pm
Yeah..I kinda ran at out ideas.
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Anaraith on February 09, 2010, 03:14:33 pm
Tiwaking smashed me :(
Title: Never give up!
Post by: Tiwaking! on February 10, 2010, 09:14:56 pm
Quote from: benlav;1065614
Yeah..I kinda ran at out ideas.


Quote from: Anaraith;1066197
Tiwaking smashed me :(

Rematch. Both of you. LETS GO!
Title: Im going to call this one over
Post by: Tiwaking! on February 12, 2010, 03:59:19 pm
Quote from: benlav;1065614
Yeah..I kinda ran at out ideas.

Good game again benlav

You've been in a sacrifice checkmate net since move 18

[edit]

1. Nb1c3 d5 2. Ng1f3 c5 3. e3 a6 4. Nf3e5 Qd8d6 5. Qd1h5 g6 6. Qh5g5 f6
7. Qg5f4 fxe5 8. Qf4a4 Bc8d7 9. Qa4h4 Ng8f6 10. f3 Nb8c6 11. a3 d4
12. Nc3e2 Bf8g7 13. Qh4f2 O-O 14. d3 Nf6g4 15. Qf2g3 Ng4xe3 16. Bc1xe3 dxe3
17. O-O-O Nc6d4 18. h4 Nd4xc2!!

I'll do an analysis when we completely finish
[/edit]

[edit2]
Game Analysis
1. Nc3 d5 2. Nf3 c5

A weird opening. White hasnt committed any pawns to attack the center so I grab as much as I can on the Queen side

3. e3 a6

White opens up the diagonal for his light squared bishop, but because I've gobbled up all the the space on the queen side, I play a6 to take away yet another square from the bishop. This leaves only the squares e2 and d3 (horrible) to develop to

4. Ne5 Qd6

The Knight moves but I try to force it to go home, centralising my queen in the process

5. Qh5 g6

White attempts a sneaky but obvious checkmate try. 6. Qxf7++. g6 blocks the threat, attacks the queen and opens up for my bishop all in one move

6. Qg5 f6

Forks the Queen and the Knight. OM NOM NOM

7. Qf4 fxe5

Attacks the Queen AGAIN

8. Qa4+ Bd7

Queen tries a sneaky check, but is batted away by the bishop

9. Qh4 Nf6 10. f3 Nc6 11. a3 d4!

White tries to restrict the mobility of the knights with his pawns. I stab and whites cramped position, aiming to get my knight to c2 for the King - Rook - Check fork

12. Ne2 Bg7

The knight runs for its life. However exchanging my d4 pawn for whites e3 pawn would open up whites position. So I develop instead

13. Qf2 0-0

White is preparing to free itself but that gives me time to get my king the hell out of Dodge

14. d3 Ng4!

Whites queen only has two squares to run to. Notice that white cant play fxg4 because of RxQ. The Queen only has one real square to go to (g3) as I can attack h4 with my bishop

15. Qg3 Nxe3

This wins a pawn and if white exchanges pieces, also wins the center

16. Bxe3 dxe3

TRIPLED e pawns!

17. 0-0-0 Nd4

Remember how I said I was going to get my Knight to c2 for a fork? Well now its going to be for checkmate

18. h4? Nxc2!!

The game is over. White is trapped in a huge net where he either gives up alot of material, gives up his attack on blacks king or gets check mated

19. Kxc2 Ba4!+ 20. b3

Notice that if the king moves then the BxR

21. ... Bxb3!

Thats right! Its a double piece sacrifice. Both the Knight and the Bishop are in the way of my big guns and the best way to fix that is to offer white something he cant refuse

22. Kxb3 c4!+

That pawn is in the way and must be sacrificed. Notice that if dxc4 then Qxd1+ is still check

23. Kxc4?

The c4 pawn was the only thing stopping my rooks from carving up the board

23. ... Rc8+ 24. Kb3 Qd5+ 25. Ka4 Qb5++

If 25. Kb2 Qb5+ 26. Ka1 (The best move) Qb3 and there is on defence. Black is threatening the Rook on d1, Qxa3+ and even e4+
[/edit2]
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: benlav on February 13, 2010, 05:18:04 pm
I'll challenge you when I get a free game. Only way I'll get better is to play peeps better then me.
Title: Just some tips on the RedHotPawn
Post by: Tiwaking! on February 18, 2010, 07:57:07 pm
If you are on RHP you might notice that almost all my games are against the Forum Users. This is because the one non-forum user I am playing with moves incredibly slowly (especially now since he's about to lose in two moves)

People on these forums actually do move at least once every three days (sometimes MORE!)!


Also: Try to use the conditional moves function as it can speed up some relatively mundane moves. If you are really smart (i.e NOT me, because I cant figure it out) then you can use the Deep Mode and setup automatic moves in positions or even play whole openings with just the press of a button!
Title: Need a better analysis please
Post by: Tiwaking! on March 02, 2010, 08:28:26 pm
I had an excellent game using the Open Games function on RedHotPawn last night. An Open Game is exactly that: Users create a new game with no opponent and anyone with a spare game can play against them!

Anaraith: You've timed out of our game. Im not going to take a timeout win though so hurry up and move already!

The game was Queenside Fianchetto vs Tiwaking (http://www.redhotpawn.com/core/playchess.php?gameid=7217564&cbqsid=28141)

1. b3 e6
The Larsen opening of b3 applies pressure on the center indirectly with the bishop. It shares an interesting relationship with the Orangutan opening (b4) except without risk of blacks cheap attack of e6

2. Bc1b2 f5
I was considering d5 here, but because I like f4 as an opening for white, I thought I'd try f5: The Dutch

3. e3 Ng8f6

A very lively game occurs if: 3. e4! fxe4 4. Qh5+ g6 5. Qe5 Nf6 6. Qxf6 Qxf6 7. Bxf6

4. Bb2xf6 Qd8xf6
This exchange caught me by surprise. The b2 bishop should be kept on the diagonal to apply pressure on the center. Not only does it weaken whites dark squares, it also gives me a free attack on the rook on a1

5. Nb1c3 Bf8b4
Gains a move by attacking the Knight. The Knight needs to be defended because the pawn cannot recapture else Qxc3+ forces either the King to move or the loss of the rock in the corner. The only way to defend the knight is Ng1e2, which blocks in the Queen AND the other bishop

6. Ng1e2 O-O
I use my free move to castle increasing the pressure along the f-file eyeing up f2 with Queen+Rook cannon

7. g3 Nb8c6

White trys to fianchetto's his other Bishop as it is out of squares to develop to. I develop a piece and am going to stonewall the postion with d5 if white fianchettos

8. Bf1g2 d5
9. a3 Bb4d6

White attacks the bishop which I dont wish to exchange just yet. I retreat hoping for possible attack lines down the black diagonals to support the Queen. White has other ideas though
10. Nc3b5 e5

Bah. Bully. I resign myself to the fact that I'm going to lose the dark squared bishop and decide to rush ahead and attack/open the f-file

11. Bg2xd5 Bc8e6

Damn. I didnt even see that my pawn was hanging, nor did I see that e5 lets me defend my bishop with my queen instead of the pawn on c7. 10. ... g5 was most probably the best move as it supported my attack without losing pawns

I need to develop my last minor piece so decide to attack whites bishop with my own expecting an exchange war

12. Bd5g2 f4

Im not sure why, but I believe the bishop retreat to g2 to be a bad move. I press on with my attack

13. Nb5xd6 cxd6

White sees through my rather unsubtle plan to win an exchange war on f4 (dxf4,exf4,gxf4,Bxf4,Nxf4,Qxf4) and eliminates one of my defenders/attackers

14. exf4 exf4
15. Ne2xf4 g5

The loss of my Bishop on d3 means Im one attacker short. With nothing to lose and two pawns down I decide to evict the knight on f4 with my pawn. The knight cannot play Nxe6 because of Qxf2++ so the knight must retreat to d3 to defend the f2 pawn

16. Nf4d3 Nc6e5

The white knight is the only defender for f2. It needs to be punished

17. O-O Be6g4

The king castles to safety and my attack peters out. Next target is the Queen. I was considering the moves: Nxd3 which wrecks whites pawn structure but does nothing else, g4 - which blocks my bishop from going to g4 but does threaten Ne3+. Bg4 forcefully gains a move and a pawn by attacking the Queen since the only reply is f3.

18. f3 Bg4xf3

The idea here was to be a pawn up in the exchange war. In fact, I was meant to play: Nxf3 here and Bxf3 was an accident

19. Bg2xf3 Ne5xf3+
20. Kg1g2 g4

I messaged my opponent here to say I did not expect this king move (I was expecting a big exchange). Since I need to defend my Knight, I do it with my g pawn

21. Nd3e1?? Nf3h4!+

The idea behind this sacrifice was, surprisingly enough, NOT to win the game! All I saw was: gxh4, Qxh4 threatening Qh3+. However the previous knight move means that the Rook on f1 is en-prise and its a two move checkmate


22. gxh4 Qf6xf1 0-1

White resigned one move before the end.

I really cant see much hope for my game after a move like: 21. Nf4 (blocking the f diagonal and defending h3)
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Anaraith on March 02, 2010, 09:47:28 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1077344

Anaraith: You've timed out of our game. Im not going to take a timeout win though so hurry up and move already!


I gave up on chess :P

But ok just for you I shall play.
Title: That was quite a game!
Post by: Tiwaking! on March 07, 2010, 07:11:42 pm
Quote from: Anaraith;1077393
I gave up on chess :P

But ok just for you I shall play.

Thanks Anaraith :) Good Game (http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardhistory.php?gameid=7161726) that was too

I didnt even realize I had a Knight check forks King + Queen on move 9
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Anaraith on March 07, 2010, 07:27:41 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1080147
Thanks Anaraith :) Good Game ([url]http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardhistory.php?gameid=7161726[/url]) that was too

I didnt even realize I had a Knight check forks King + Queen on move 9


Haha dam you are good. I didn't have much idea what I was doing past my current move and didn't even realise I walked into checkmate at the end.
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on March 07, 2010, 08:14:30 pm
Sorry Tiwa, I can't really be bothered feeding my pieces to you :/
Title: Tiwaking vs Pyromanik: Game 2
Post by: Tiwaking! on March 08, 2010, 06:10:38 pm
Quote from: Anaraith;1077393
I gave up on chess :P

Me too. I'll sit around and take challenges, but actively playing requires too much brain power: Power I could be using to play Counterstrike
Quote from: Pyromanik;1080173
Sorry Tiwa, I can't really be bothered feeding my pieces to you :/

1. f4 d5
2. Ng1f3 Ng8f6

Black bullies me away from playing e4
3. e3 c5
4. c3 Nb8c6

Im trying to take away blacks knights options by restricting the squares where they can move. Currently e4 is open for the knight, but I can easily boot it with d3.

5. Bf1b5 a6
6. Qd1a4 e6

With nothing to lose I lash out at blacks queens knight. Notice that the a pawn is pinned here since axb5, Qxa8 and black is a rook down. Blacks e6 loses a pawn since Bd7 is required to prevent Bxc6+, bxc6, Qxc6+

7. Bb5xc6 Bc8d7?
8. Bc6xd7 Qd8xd7
9. Qa4c2 c4

Scored a free knight and my queen escapes

10. Nf3e5 Qd7b5

This Knight move gains a move since the Queen is forced away

11. Nb1a3 Qb5b6

...and again

12. Qc2a4 Ke8d8?

Black cannot block the Queen check with his own queen because of NxQ. The king retreats to the entirely wrong square

13. Ne5xf7+! Kd8c7
14. Nf7xh8 Bf8xa3

And loses his rook

15. Qa4xa3 Ra8xh8
16. Qe7+ Nf6d7
17. Qe7xg7 Rh8f8

Basically my queen is trying to squeeze black to death, pinning his knight, taking pieces and threatening to eat everything in sight

18. Qg7xh7 a5
19. g4 d4

My g pawn is a monster. It has no opposing pawns and is going to try to advance to the end of the board

20. cxd4 Qb6c6

The black squares around my king are totally safe from any Queen attack

21. Rh1f1 Qc6g2

This was a good try, but all Im focussing on at the moment is promoting the g-pawn. The Queen has no way through the kings fortress

22. g5 Qg2g4

Black NEEDED to play Kd6 or something here to free up his knight
23. g6 Qg4xg6???
24. Qh7xg6 resigns

Even without the blunder, black needs to give up another piece to prevent g=Queen and even if it DOES, then the h pawn is going to get promoted as well
Title: Für Müncher
Post by: Tiwaking! on March 09, 2010, 07:59:49 pm
Tiwaking vs Muncher (http://www.redhotpawn.com/core/playchess.php?gameid=7180970)

Shit. I've just done the wrong move. This has been one of the hardest games I've played so far.

1. f4 d5
2. Nf3 g6!

g6 is an excellent move here. Black is under no pressure to develop any pieces just yet

3. e3 Bg7

Black threatens d4 here without commiting his Knight to a square

4. c3 Nc6

d4 is under attack by two pieces, but defended by two pawns. Its interesting to note that I've found that playing c4? in the birds opening is quite bad (Tiwaking vs Anaraith (http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardhistory.php?gameid=7143148)) as declining the pawn gives black an advantage

I decide to take the risky alternative to the normal Stonewall (which is d4) and wipe out an attacker

5. Bb5?! a6
6. Bxc6 bxc6
7. Ne5 Qd6

I am trying to bait blacks bishop into exchanging here which would give me a nice center: Bxe5, fxe5 followed by d4 and Im in a good way. Black declines the exchange and defends the c6 pawn with is queen so....

8. 0-0 Bxe5
9. fxe5 Qxe5

Sacrifices a pawn, but I gain a move on the queen with

10. d4 Qd6

This is the best square for the Queen. Note that the Queen could also go to e6 which is slightly more vulnerable (moving the Rook behind the e pawn maybe)

The move I am horrified of Muncher playing here is: f4 which would totally destroy any chance of a quick attack. This is why I didnt play the obvious: Qf4. So: I sacrifice another pawn

11. e4?! dxe4
12. Nd2? Nf6?

Thank goodness for Nf6! The correct move I should have played here is: 12. Bf5! Which gains a move on the Queen. Please note that I am 100% sure that Black is going to castle king side here.

13. Nc4 Qe6
14. Ne5 Bd7

PHEW! Dodged a very large and very angry bullet here. Qe6, Nf6 and the Bishop on c8 are threatening the square: g4, which is the diagonal where my Queen is. Now, it may not look it, but my Queen is actually pinned to d1 for various defensive reasons

Ne5 defends g4 from a queen exchange attempt or a sneaky bishop attacks queen attempt

15. h3 0-0-0!

This move caught me by surprise. The reason being is the location of the White Queen in relation to the Black King. I grasp my only hope of a quick attack

16. Qa4 c5

The bishop threatens my queen and must die

17. Nxd7 Nxd7 - Rxd7 is also playable here

If Qxd7?? Qxa6+, Kb8, Ba7+, Ka8, Bb6+, Kb8, Qa7++.

18. Be3 exd4

Im trying to play: exd4 followed by d5! I couldnt do this straight away as my rooks are not connected AND exd4, Nxd4 and my Queen is attacked losing a move. The bishop is now defending the pawn.

19. Bxd4 Nf6 - Blocks the attack on blacks rook
20. Rae1 Rhe8

And finally the bad move....

21. Qc2

What should have been played here is b4 and pushing the pawn to eradicate the pieces in my Queens way

Chess is too hard a game
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on March 09, 2010, 08:01:58 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1081590

Chess is too hard a game


A fickle mistress.
Title: One of my favourite chess quotes
Post by: Tiwaking! on March 09, 2010, 08:12:25 pm
Quote from: Pyromanik;1081591
A fickle mistress.

“If Chess is a science, it's a most inexact one. If Chess is an art, it is too exacting to be seen as one. If Chess is a sport, it's too esoteric. If Chess is a game, it's too demanding to be just a game. If Chess is a mistress, she's a demanding one. If Chess is a passion, it's a rewarding one. If Chess is life, it's a sad one”
(Unknown)
Title: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on March 09, 2010, 08:20:16 pm
So true. One wrong move and things can turn around just like that! *waits 15 minutes then clicks fingers*
Title: Für Müncher part deux
Post by: Tiwaking! on March 10, 2010, 05:02:16 pm
Quote from: Tiwaking!;1081590
Tiwaking vs Muncher ([url]http://www.redhotpawn.com/core/playchess.php?gameid=7180970[/url])

21. Qc2

What should have been played here is b4 and pushing the pawn to eradicate the pieces in my Queens way

Chess is too hard a game

Unbelievable

Muncher just threw away a drawn game! (pictured below)

21. ... g5 - Stopping the rook from playing Rf4
22. g4 Qxa2? - g4 lets me play Rf5 instead. I was hoping Muncher would take the bait on a2 since eating that pawn leads to a drawn ending
23. Bxf6 exf6
23. Rxe4 Rxe4
24. Qxe4 Rd6 - Defends both f6 and any attempt to play Qc6+
25. Qa8+ Kd7 - Forced
26. Re1 Re6 - Prevents Qe8++
27. Rd1+ Rd6 - I offered Muncher a draw here. The game is effectively drawn since the only chance I have is Re1 which Muncher can block by playing Re6

28. Re1 Qxb2??? - The worst move!
29. Qe8++

That game was too hard. Far too hard
Title: USParaTrooper vs Tiwaking
Post by: Tiwaking! on April 12, 2010, 12:55:41 pm
Here is an interesting game I had recently. USParaTrooper had been complaining in the chess forums about losing his temper when he lost. Had a look at his games and he didnt really have anything to be angry about, was pretty solid play, but got outplayed by better players

I decided to test him and challenged him to a game (I am playing as black)

1.d4 f5 - This is the black Dutch defense. It stops e5 and frees up the f file
2. Nc3 nf6?

Yeah. A mistake on move two? Its not a true mistake, its just that it can lead to some very 'hard' situations for black where bad move = lose. The problem here is: 3. d5! Since I cant play Nxd5 and it prevents e5 since dxe5, dxe5 QxQ KxQ and I am slighty worse off

3.Bf4? e6 - Bf4 is definitely a mistake. It is throwing a piece out to be attacked whereas it isnt supporting or attacking anything important

4. Nf3 Bb4 5. a3 Bxf3 6.bxf3 Nc6

This is good for me. It wrecks whites pawn structure and gains a move which I use to develop a piece. Whites best option would have probably been 5. Qd3 to stop his pawns being wrecked

7.e3 Nh5

The idea here is to make white think they are gaining the upper hand by 'winning' a move with a safe attack on the Queen

The true purpose of the move is to try and force an exchange:

 - 8. Bg5 Nf6
 - 9. (Pretty much any move other than BxN) h6

8. Bg5 Nf6
9. Be2 h6
10. Bh4? g5!

In this case USArmyParatrooper declined the exchange and traded a piece for two pawns. He probably saw an attack with: Bh5+

The problem is after: Rxh5, Qxh5+, Nxh5, BxQ, KxQ - White has traded two bishops and a Queen for a Rook and a Queen. White already being a pawn down AND with a smashed pawn structure means its chances of winning are slim

11. Nxg5 hxg5 12.Bxg5 Qe7

And here comes a bad move

12. 0-0? Qh7

Castles right into an instant-checkmate threat. There are several ways to prevent: Qxh7++, but White chooses the most obvious one

13.h3 Ne4!

Unpinned the knight can go wreak havoc on the white position. It attacks the bishop and the unprotected pawn on d3, which threatens a fork. It impossible to prevent all these threats. However I mess up here

14. f4 Nxg5? - D'oh. My eagerness to eat that annoying bishop gets the better of me
15.fxg5 Qg8 - The g pawn threatens to become an advancing monster
16.Bh5+ Kd8 - Castling rights gone
17.Be2 Qxg5 - Problem pawn OM NOM NOM
18.Rf3 b6

Rf3 is forced as I am threatening Rxh3 (fxh3 is not possible as it is pinned by the Queen)

19.Qd2? Bb7 - I am pretty sure that Qe1 was required here. It threatens Rg3 threatening blacks Queen

20. d5? Ne5! - Threatens whites rook, but that is not the true purpose of this move....

21.dxe6?? Bxf3

White resigns

USParatrooper overlooked the fact that:

Ne5 prevents any attempt to play Qxe2++
Ne5 pins the d pawn to the rook on f3
Ne5 threatens Nxf3+ which forks the King and Queen
f3 is completely unprotected
f2 is completely unprotected

edit: 3. Bf4? e6 (originally e5, mistake)
Title: Chess: Tiwaking vs Pyromanik
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 21, 2014, 01:38:56 am
Just had a fun game against Pyromanik which you can check out here:
http://www.redhotpawn.com/core/playchess.php?gameid=10432016&cbqsid=15979 (http://www.redhotpawn.com/core/playchess.php?gameid=10432016&cbqsid=15979)

I'll post up the annotated analysis game as well. I actually messed up the ending and missed a Mate in Two!

Good Game Pyro, but what was with you letting me eat your Knights like that?!
Title: Re: Chess: Tiwaking vs Pyromanik
Post by: Pyromanik on January 21, 2014, 01:45:35 am
That my friend, is called extreme rust.

I had a reasonably strong opening I thought, purely by accident for the most part. I had no plan after that, and the opening left me reasonably restricted with my bigger pieces. I tried for some traps, but often didn't see a third piece that could defeat me. That's what happened with both knights I think.

Once you moved your second knight into play it pretty much locked down the board and crippled the majority of my plans (most of which I'd made then ignored anyway, leading to the capture of my second knight). I didn't have my pieces in the right places and not enough moves left before your looming checkmate for me to salvage any useful play.

But it was fun to play again. We should do this more often. But for now I'll break I think, plus it's nearly 2am in NZ, do you not have work in the morning?
Title: Chess: Tiwaking vs Pyromanik - annotated edition
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 21, 2014, 02:08:18 am
That my friend, is called extreme rust.

I had a reasonably strong opening I thought, purely by accident for the most part. I had no plan after that, and the opening left me reasonably restricted with my bigger pieces. I tried for some traps, but often didn't see a third piece that could defeat me. That's what happened with both knights I think.

Once you moved your second knight into play it pretty much locked down the board and crippled the majority of my plans (most of which I'd made then ignored anyway, leading to the capture of my second knight). I didn't have my pieces in the right places and not enough moves left before your looming checkmate for me to salvage any useful play.

But it was fun to play again. We should do this more often. But for now I'll break I think, plus it's nearly 2am in NZ, do you not have work in the morning?

I am on holiday

e3 for black is a defensive opening. I personally think e3 is probably the best opening for both sides, but it leads too almost every opening type in the game so learning it would be a problem

Here is the annotations for the game. You can actually make your own annotated versions of games too! You can even comment on my annotations
http://www.redhotpawn.com/annotation/annotationinteractive.php?annotationid=3907 (http://www.redhotpawn.com/annotation/annotationinteractive.php?annotationid=3907)

I am trying to get the annotated pgn
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 21, 2014, 02:14:55 am
hahaha

Quote from: Tiwaking
Na5? I will punish this

I actually lol'd, well done my friend.
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: benlav on January 21, 2014, 11:15:45 am
I'm keen, not sure when I last played... So resistance will be futile (mine) for a while.
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 21, 2014, 11:57:09 am
Last time you and I played we drew.

I suspect a similar outcome if we play again now.
Title: Redhotpawn - Blitz
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 21, 2014, 05:54:53 pm
A few years ago the Red Hot Pawn website created a Blitz program to play online in real time

http://www.redhotpawn.com/blitz/playblitzchess.php (http://www.redhotpawn.com/blitz/playblitzchess.php)

The scores and results of this game arent recorded. I've only had two games and lost both of them badly. You can play anywhere from 1 minute with 0 second increments to 60 minutes with 60 second increments. Every move you make gives you extra time on the clock based on the Increment setting

I'd suggest 10 minute blitz with 30 second increments
Title: Tiwaking vs Pyromanik rematch 1
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 22, 2014, 02:11:54 am
That was absolutely crazy. I messed up the ending really badly!
Oh Pyro, your 11th move was an absolute disaster!

For some reason my conditional moves werent being played so I was forced to manually do stuff, thats where I made that bad mistake at move 21 and lost the bishop

http://www.redhotpawn.com/core/playchess.php?gameid=10433075&cbqsid=9350 (http://www.redhotpawn.com/core/playchess.php?gameid=10433075&cbqsid=9350)

For anyone interested, here is a screenshot of the final position of this crazy game

edit: And now he's just challenged me to another two games. Its like 2:30 in the morning!
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 22, 2014, 02:18:47 am
It sure was interesting indeed. As you said I didn't develop pieces early enough, I was busy defending against your agressive opening. Then in the end I did a bit of a hari kari, hehe. I wasn't getting out of that :P
But looking at improvements, I managed to capture a similar number of pieces this time :D
Title: Tiwaking vs Pyromanik - Kings Gambit 1 Annotated
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 22, 2014, 11:44:36 am
It sure was interesting indeed. As you said I didn't develop pieces early enough, I was busy defending against your agressive opening. Then in the end I did a bit of a hari kari, hehe. I wasn't getting out of that :P
But looking at improvements, I managed to capture a similar number of pieces this time :D

Here is an annotated version of our game
http://www.redhotpawn.com/annotation/annotationinteractive.php?annotationid=3911 (http://www.redhotpawn.com/annotation/annotationinteractive.php?annotationid=3911)

There were loads of defensive moves you didnt have to play, like a6 attacking my Bishop, but that move 11. Rae1 c5?? Was really bad. Your pawns were all perfectly fine where they were

During the game I totally missed dxc7. Also, because you had quite a few forced move situations, I set up a bunch of conditional moves but the system didnt seem to be making them and I was getting "Its your move" alerts
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 22, 2014, 12:24:17 pm
Yeah I was worried about dxc7 a lot, but I was being walked about anyway, so wasn't too much concerned. I decided to trap myself rather than let it finally get promoted, I couldn't bare that fate :P
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Arseynimz on January 22, 2014, 01:04:04 pm
Keen to play a few games, and be horrible, but learn some shit. Where do I sign up!?
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 22, 2014, 01:21:43 pm
Keen to play a few games, and be horrible, but learn some shit. Where do I sign up!?

thread title ;)

Once signed up, Benlav is 'Benlav', Tiwaking! is 'Tiwaking', and I am 'Pyromanik'. You should be able to view our profile pages, to which their is a challenge button in the left menu. If not (not sure there's a search) just type our names in when you make a 'New game' (button top of page when logged in).

Though I don't recommend playing Tiwa or Ben Lav. The former will give you a right spanking, and the latter is yet to answer my challenge after saying he was keen (I guess he forgot his login or something).

There are also randos floating around. Never played them though, I like the idea of getting spanked by folks I know better than being embarrassed by folks I don't :P
Title: Red Hot Pawn - Where bad Bishops go for fun
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 22, 2014, 01:25:14 pm
Pyromanik challenged me to three games at once, and it was a very fast series of three games!

http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardanalysis.php?gameid=10433913&cbqsid=21223 (http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardanalysis.php?gameid=10433913&cbqsid=21223)
In this game I totally missed Qc4 mate!! I thought you would fall for my mating attack on the 17th move, but you sacrificed everything going for a draw, which you almost got! I didnt even realize it was almost a draw until you warned me


http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardanalysis.php?gameid=10433912&cbqsid=18033 (http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardanalysis.php?gameid=10433912&cbqsid=18033)
In this game you were totally winning
11. Qxd6 was a great move but when I woke up this morning I got this:
13. Qc5?? And got a free Queen!

http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardanalysis.php?gameid=10433914&cbqsid=6038 (http://www.redhotpawn.com/gameanalysis/boardanalysis.php?gameid=10433914&cbqsid=6038)
And finally in this game you fell for one of the dirtiest tricks in the book. Black can never play exf5


Keen to play a few games, and be horrible, but learn some shit. Where do I sign up!?

Go to www.redhotpawn.com (http://www.redhotpawn.com) and create a login. I suggest playing benlav or Pyromanik. I have to pull out all my dirtiest of dirty tricks against Pyromanik
Munc_her is quite fun too
Anaraith is currently the worst player

edit: OH! Note that you can use the Opening Book function! This means that all the starting moves you play will come from one of the established Openings. It is not cheating to do so and isnt frowned or looked down upon.

I never use this function because I dont use standard openings. They're so mainstream :chesshipster:

There is also a conditional moves function which lets you play moves in advance. I use this all the time when people are stuck in a mating net and only have one available move
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 22, 2014, 01:38:31 pm
I'm not so gullible to fall for the 4 move mate!

Three games at once was more from curiosity. I wanted to play three games at the same time and see how they developed. Maybe I could identify some kind of weakness in myself, or maybe you'd think less and make some mistakes :P I varied from that a little as I moved to different tactics in each, slowly coming together and falling apart as I got more tired...

Interesting though in some success in the plan. All three games picked up as I took on board that you identified that I play very defencivly and got more aggressive (at least for a bit in the case of the more sacrifical strategy - wasn't going for a draw, more just hoping to come out on top after a game of attrition ;) )
Title: Tiwaking vs Pyromanik games 1, 2 ,3 Annotated
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 22, 2014, 04:20:35 pm
I'm not so gullible to fall for the 4 move mate!

Three games at once was more from curiosity. I wanted to play three games at the same time and see how they developed. Maybe I could identify some kind of weakness in myself, or maybe you'd think less and make some mistakes :P I varied from that a little as I moved to different tactics in each, slowly coming together and falling apart as I got more tired...

Interesting though in some success in the plan. All three games picked up as I took on board that you identified that I play very defencivly and got more aggressive (at least for a bit in the case of the more sacrifical strategy - wasn't going for a draw, more just hoping to come out on top after a game of attrition ;) )

Here are all three games with Annotations and a picture from a Critical moment in the game:
http://www.redhotpawn.com/annotation/annotationinteractive.php?annotationid=3912 (http://www.redhotpawn.com/annotation/annotationinteractive.php?annotationid=3912)
(http://www.getsome.co.nz/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=49968.0;attach=7986;image)
http://www.redhotpawn.com/annotation/annotationinteractive.php?annotationid=3913 (http://www.redhotpawn.com/annotation/annotationinteractive.php?annotationid=3913)
(http://www.getsome.co.nz/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=49968.0;attach=7988;image)
http://www.redhotpawn.com/annotation/annotationinteractive.php?annotationid=3914 (http://www.redhotpawn.com/annotation/annotationinteractive.php?annotationid=3914)
(http://www.getsome.co.nz/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=49968.0;attach=7981;image)
Title: Re: Tiwaking vs Pyromanik games 1, 2 ,3 Annotated
Post by: Pyromanik on January 22, 2014, 10:49:06 pm
Here are all three games with Annotations and a picture from a Critical moment in the game:
[url]http://www.redhotpawn.com/annotation/annotationinteractive.php?annotationid=3912[/url] ([url]http://www.redhotpawn.com/annotation/annotationinteractive.php?annotationid=3912[/url])
([url]http://www.getsome.co.nz/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=49968.0;attach=7986;image[/url])


This one I had grand designs for. Unfortunately for me, I didn't see knight guarding d7; I was too focussed on the queen being safe in that position. The idea was to cd7, then maybe leverage the Queens safety for the bishop to move in and pin the king, or something. Dunno, but it didn't work in any case, was basically a waste of a move in the end, although it looked impressive at first :P
Title: Tiwaking vs Pyromanik game 1 Annotated
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 22, 2014, 11:11:45 pm
Here are all three games with Annotations and a picture from a Critical moment in the game:
[url]http://www.redhotpawn.com/annotation/annotationinteractive.php?annotationid=3912[/url] ([url]http://www.redhotpawn.com/annotation/annotationinteractive.php?annotationid=3912[/url])
([url]http://www.getsome.co.nz/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=49968.0;attach=7986;image[/url])


This one I had grand designs for. Unfortunately for me, I didn't see knight guarding d7; I was too focussed on the queen being safe in that position. The idea was to cd7, then maybe leverage the Queens safety for the bishop to move in and pin the king, or something. Dunno, but it didn't work in any case, was basically a waste of a move in the end, although it looked impressive at first :P

The diagram shows that your Queen is perfectly safe. I was expecting 0-0-0 (Castles Queenside) and I'd be totally lost. Because even if I attack your Queen, you can play Qxc7. You could even play Qxc7 now. Anything would have been better than Qc5
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 22, 2014, 11:47:54 pm
urgh d7, I meant c7. I'd have got a pawn, you'd have got my queen. Didn't seem like a good move, but castling probably would have been!
Title: Tiwaking vs Pyromanik game 1 Annotated Edition
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 23, 2014, 05:48:16 am
urgh d7, I meant c7. I'd have got a pawn, you'd have got my queen. Didn't seem like a good move, but castling probably would have been!
Actually you're right! You cant play Qxc6 at the moment because the Knight is protecting it. The only move that frees my position is Ng6 and then Be2 and then Be6 and then castles

That is alot of And Thens. The Knight can go the other way with: Nc8, Nb6, Be2 and castles. But all this only happens if you let me, and a game is going  badly when an opponent dictates your moves
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 23, 2014, 06:07:19 am
As I let you do too often :/
Title: Fischers Random Chess
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 26, 2014, 10:07:31 pm
As I let you do too often :/
You should give Fischers Random Chess aka Chess960 a go!
http://www.chesshotel.com/play-random-chess.php (http://www.chesshotel.com/play-random-chess.php)

It's crazy complicated, but really fun. This one game I accidentally lost my Queen and a Knight yet still somehow won, all due to our starting position and my opponent castling into my rooks
Title: RedHotPawn - Fischers Random Chess
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 28, 2014, 08:01:28 pm
As I let you do too often :/
You should give Fischers Random Chess aka Chess960 a go!

NO WAY! RedHotPawn just integrated Fischers Random Chess into their New Game setup
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=156513&page=&page=2 (http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=156513&page=&page=2)
Quote from: ponderable
27 Jan '14 11:42
Originally posted by Linden Lyons
I'd also like to see Fischer Random Chess on RHP.
Go to New game / set up your won board / Fischer Random Start

The games are unrated though.

http://www.redhotpawn.com/core/paintboard.php?isficsherstart=true (http://www.redhotpawn.com/core/paintboard.php?isficsherstart=true)

Fischers Random Chess is great for Real Time. Dont think it would be great for the Postal that we play though
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 29, 2014, 02:47:01 am
There's also a brand new World Chess Champion.
Magnusson or similar. He looked young in the picture I saw.

I went to London and there's this shop on Baker St. (other than the Sherlock Holmes Museum), completely dedicated to Chess, card games & a few other classics (like backgammon). I think you would have really liked it Tiwa.

I got a book by Kasparov. It's for kids, so I should be able to understand it :P
Title: Magnus Carlsen, hes a badass
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 29, 2014, 11:46:47 am
There's also a brand new World Chess Champion.
Magnusson or similar. He looked young in the picture I saw.

I went to London and there's this shop on Baker St. (other than the Sherlock Holmes Museum), completely dedicated to Chess, card games & a few other classics (like backgammon). I think you would have really liked it Tiwa.

I got a book by Kasparov. It's for kids, so I should be able to understand it :P
I dont actually read chess books and have been trying to figure it out myself. However, YouTube is full of great videos about different ideas and it is twenty times better than any old smelly book daddy-o

Magnus Carlsen is one of my favourite (Living) Chess players and it is about time he became World Champion.  In 2011 he had a chance to play in the World Championship Candidate Matches, but decided not too because the Candidate Matches are stupid.

Here is a video from the 2004 documentary about Magnus Carlsen, when Magnus was only 13. The game was drawn, which is pretty amazing considering he was playing straight into Kasparov's favourite opening: Queens Gambit Declined
Magnus Carlsen Vs. Kasparov (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjEmquJhSas#ws)
And here is an analysis of their second game in which Magnus lost
Karpov beaten by a 13-yr-old Magnus Carlsen (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_308KNAuFkg#ws)
And here he is smashing one of the best players in the world, Grand Master and former World Champion Anatoly Karpov, who was also playing in the same tournament
Karpov beaten by a 13-yr-old Magnus Carlsen (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_308KNAuFkg#ws)
Magnus Carlsen plays like an absolute machine in the end game, and has flawless technique. He was also spent a year being trained by Gary Kasparov himself! Here is what Kasparov had to say about Magnus Carlsen:
http://time100.time.com/2013/11/25/a-new-king-for-a-new-era-in-chess/ (http://time100.time.com/2013/11/25/a-new-king-for-a-new-era-in-chess/)
Quote from: Gary Kasparov
Carlsen’s greatest chess strength is his remarkable intuitive grasp of simplified positions and his tremendous accuracy in them. I coached Carlsen for a year, in 2009, and I was amazed at how quickly he could correctly evaluate a position “cold,” seemingly without any calculation at all. My own style required tremendous energy and labor at the board, working through deep variations looking for the truth in each position. Carlsen comes from a different world champion lineage, that of Jose Capablanca and Anatoly Karpov, players who sense harmony on the board like virtuoso musicians with perfect pitch.

However, Magnus Carlsen has taken ALOT of criticism:

1. He plays like a computer
2. His attitude towards the World Championship (which he is now) is considered to be disrespectful
3. He very very rarely accepts draws and usually plays threefold repetition
4. He hasnt actually done anything in Chess

The main reason these criticisms have been leveled at him in particular is because of the change to classic tournament game formats. In the old days, tournament games could be held over several days by adjourning a game in progress. In the age of computers, this is now impossible, so players must sit (well, they can walk around too) there for eight, nine, ten hours. Older players are no match for younger, fitter rivals. And now that the younger, fitter rivals are also trained by our silicon overlords, this means an end to human driven chess styles.

tl;dr Magnus Carlsen is dreamy
Title: Magnus Carlsen vs Bill Gates
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 29, 2014, 06:32:13 pm
New video of Magnus Carlsen discovered!
Skavlan: Magnus Carlsen VS Bill Gates (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84NwnSltHFo#ws)
Wow!! I had no idea people took so long to make opening moves. I only play one opening for white, The Birds Opening (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird's_Opening) and if the opponent deviates from the move order they get destroyed

That being said, Mr Gates did well. I cant play nearly as well as he did given only 2 minutes. That is ridiculously stressful
Title: Chess aka I wouldnt watch a video for 14 minutes either
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 29, 2014, 09:04:51 pm
As I let you do too often :/
You should give Fischers Random Chess aka Chess960 a go!
[url]http://www.chesshotel.com/play-random-chess.php[/url] ([url]http://www.chesshotel.com/play-random-chess.php[/url])

It's crazy complicated, but really fun. This one game I accidentally lost my Queen and a Knight yet still somehow won, all due to our starting position and my opponent castling into my rooks
What does a game of Fischers Random Chess sound like?
Fischers Random Chess 1 (Live) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rayzOIPJzdE#)
My rules on castling are wrong because the sides are reversed due to me playing as black. Next time I make a video I'll use a pop filter. Dont play people who play for less than 6 minute games, its too hard
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 29, 2014, 11:40:54 pm
Magnus Carlsen. He looked young in the picture I saw.


He was also in a pool in a suit like a rockstar.
***
this photo:
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Xd2UjhTvXL8/Uo-QueX-D_I/AAAAAAAAGlM/uB6DKS4TBKU/s600/magnus-carlsen%2Bfb.jpg)

I dont actually read chess books and have been trying to figure it out myself.


Me too. But I thought 'why not' while I was there, plus it's for kids so it's not all intense 500 page thesis like some of the others on offer, hehe.
Although most were actually on players rather than the game pure.

I only play one opening for white, The Birds Opening ([url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird's_Opening[/url]) and if the opponent deviates from the move order they get destroyed


Although there was this one book that caught my eye...
http://www.amazon.com/How-Play-Against-1-e4/dp/1857445864 (http://www.amazon.com/How-Play-Against-1-e4/dp/1857445864)


I spent most of my time looking at the very cool pieces they had, ornate boards, etc.
Oh, and they had analog set computer players, whatever they're called.
Title: Chess Openings vs e4
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 30, 2014, 12:13:05 am
Although there was this one book that caught my eye...
[url]http://www.amazon.com/How-Play-Against-1-e4/dp/1857445864[/url] ([url]http://www.amazon.com/How-Play-Against-1-e4/dp/1857445864[/url])


I spent most of my time looking at the very cool pieces they had, ornate boards, etc.
Oh, and they had analog set computer players, whatever they're called.

Oh! To play against 1.e4 I play one of two openings:

1.e4 Nf6 - The Alekhines which I play if I am going for an absolute win

or

1.e4 c5 followed by e6 - The Sicillian Kan, which I play if I dont know how good the opponent is

Why these two openings? Three reasons:

First: Independent Discovery
The Alekhines was the first opening I 'discovered', that is, found out about by myself just by spamming the board with opening moves. What usually happens is that Black keeps attacking over and over again until white gives up

The Sicillian Kan I found recently in a YouTube Video
Chess Openings: Introduction to the Sicilian Kan (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDk-rKv197A#)
There are also two interesting variations which people discovered independently: The Petrodactyl/Teranondon and the "GreenCastleBlock Sicilian".

Second: Less Learning Required
Once Learned, Always Learned. These openings have very simple ideas along the lines of "develop, develop, develop, attack". Notice that 'defend' isnt used here. Because of the only developing moves being defensive ones, it means that if your opponent attacks then they are wasting their time

Third: Very Few Variations
Once you learn the three or four variations, that is all you really need to know. After learning these you can see that if the opponent varies from the set move order, then something bad must happen to them. Once you realize/suspect the opponent has made a mistake, you can devote all your mental effort on punishing them severely.

To give an example of how "Few Variations" is one of the biggest advantages:

Chess uses Codes for Chess Openings called the "Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings" or ECO for short
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopaedia_of_Chess_Openings (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopaedia_of_Chess_Openings)
For the Sicillian Opening (1.e4 c5) The ECO codes start at B20 and run all the way to B99. That is 79 Variations for just one opening. Trying to remember all those opening variations will make you go mad

The Alekhine is my favourite opening because if your opponent goes wrong, then you can usually sense it in the same way a good programmer has good "Code Smell". Plus, very few people ever face it as an opening and usually run into the old 1.e4 e5 series of openings
Title: Chess Online All Night
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 30, 2014, 04:27:20 am
Doh. I accidentally played Blitz and Fischers Random Chess all night. There is this one player by the handle Muhammed on Chess Hotel that I cannot beat at Fischers Random Chess. His play is amazing. He stops everything I throw at him.

The last game I played I threw a twelve move deep combination at him and I was 100% sure I'd beat him or at least break up his position. But he found the one move that stopped my entire attack, even though almost every single one of his pieces was pinned. Usually when we play I just get positionally crushed and smothered, which is a horrible feeling, but this loss was just amazing. A once in a lifetime kind of event.

It takes me two minutes to think up a twelve move deep combination, but a thirteen move one would take an exponential amount of time, something along the line of twenty minutes.

And for some weird reason most of the people there who play normal Blitz (which I play when no one is available for Chess960) keep playing either 1.e4, which I crush with the Alekhine's usually transposing into the Four Knights Game, but good for Black or they weirdly play 1.f4, which I destroy because they keep trying to play the 1.f4,e3,d4 Stonewall which has one huge weakness: The e4 square

I sure wish I could save games from their site!
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on January 30, 2014, 08:28:04 am
You can export to PGN or some other notation can't you?

I'm pretty sure there are a bunch of apps out there that will let you import a game. Xboard probably will, being what it is *shrug*
Title: Chess and Mathematics
Post by: Tiwaking! on February 01, 2014, 09:57:59 pm
One of the benefits at  being nearby a learning facility is you get to have, um, 'discussions' with people about different subjects. One of these subjects in an IT setting is Chess, and there appears to be a huge amount of misinformation about Chess and Computer Chess. For people who dont want to  read on:

1. The number of possible Chess games is smaller than you would expect ~4,670,000 games
2. The average game of Chess is 30 moves long
3. Computers that are stripped of their opening book play at the same level as an amateur human
4. Computer Chess is not fallible. This is proven by the World Computer Chess competitions where the winning programs are the ones that lose the LEAST often (not 'never lose', but lose the least often)


1. There's an old saying about "After both sides make four moves, the number of positions in Chess is more than the number of stars in the observable universe". This assumes that all positions are possible, which is absurd. You can find more information debunking this myth here: http://www.chess.com/chessopedia/view/mathematics-and-chess. (http://www.chess.com/chessopedia/view/mathematics-and-chess.) Incidentally: The End Game Tablebases are for Six Pieces is over 1 terrabyte, but the Seven Piece Tablebase is 100TB (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endgame_tablebase). You have to remember that many, many games never actually make it this far. It also explains why a Chess Computer enjoys exchanging pieces (see point 4)
2. I have long suspected that a game of Chess isnt as long as people seem to make it out to be. In fact: I always aim to finish a game of chess before the 30th move. After 30 moves, usually becomes clear that someone has made a mistake somewhere
3. I tried making a Chess A.I, just to see how hard it would be. Turns out the 'best' way to do it is to download all the Endgame Tablebases (http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/tablebases-online/) and Opening Books (http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCEQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hiarcs.com%2Fchess-opening-book-free.htm&ei=W7PsUoGXMIbRkQWZyIHgAw&usg=AFQjCNHE-n40sDOpSW5DejYI6ZgIXoJIHA&sig2=OiePO4h9si6tESlVM2Q9Zw) and then create an algorithm that evaluates positions based on a set of instructions.
However this turns out to be both a boring and fruitless exercise. In fact, it is easier to find all possible checkmate positions and use that as a basis for Engine Evaluation. Being far too lazy to do that I ended up doing it the old fashioned way: Make an A.I that randomly plays moves and let the opposing player evaluate its play. What happens is you end up with an A.I that is impossible to distinguish from an average player. In fact, you could make a Chess Website/App and populate it entirely with A.I players and human players would have no idea who was a person or not
4. World Champion Wilhelm Steinitz once said "Chess is a draw with best play". Well, it turns out he wasnt exactly right. Chess is a draw with the Least Interesting Play. For example: The chess engines Fruit and Crafty used an innovative idea: There are good moves, bad moves, and 'interesting' moves. Good and Bad moves are evaluated normally (+1/-1) where 'interesting' moves are given a tiny bonus (+0.1 or so). This means, when these two engines are given the opportunity to DRAW, they will frequently choose the 'Interesting' move option instead
You can export to PGN or some other notation can't you?

I'm pretty sure there are a bunch of apps out there that will let you import a game. Xboard probably will, being what it is *shrug*
You cant get the PGN from the Chess Hotel games so I'll just live record them
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on February 02, 2014, 12:18:51 pm
I went to London and there's this shop on Baker St. (other than the Sherlock Holmes Museum), completely dedicated to Chess, card games & a few other classics (like backgammon). I think you would have really liked it Tiwa.

This one:
http://shop.chess.co.uk/Visit-Shop-s/1885.htm (http://shop.chess.co.uk/Visit-Shop-s/1885.htm)

Lots of cool sets. But oddly they don't seem to be in their online shop that I saw.
Title: Chess960 vs Computer
Post by: Tiwaking! on March 21, 2014, 06:12:01 pm
To anyone interested in playing Chess960 against the computer you can play it here:

http://sa.lichess.org/ (http://sa.lichess.org/)

Warning. I've yet to win a game against level 4 stockfish

edit:Messed up the URL. It linked to a game I lost horribly. There are also Interactive Chess Puzzles you can solve!
Title: Chess - Stockfish 4 vs Tiwaking
Post by: Tiwaking! on March 27, 2014, 09:26:29 pm
After getting my arse handed to me constantly at Fischers Random Chess by Stockfish level 4 I decided to try a game of normal chess

I played as Black and I smashed it
http://sa.lichess.org/45DyPYue/black (http://sa.lichess.org/45DyPYue/black)

At move 17 it started thinking really, really hard. It took over ten seconds to come up with a move. When a computer thinks in Chess, it means that it is losing.
Can you see the correct continuation? It took me about 3 minutes to figure out so it wasnt easy. The only reason I looked so hard is because the computer took time out of its busy schedule to try and not lose
(http://www.getsome.co.nz/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=49968.0;attach=8229;image)
Title: Magnus Carlsen - G-Star Raw
Post by: Tiwaking! on March 29, 2014, 09:26:34 am
Magnus Carlsen. He looked young in the picture I saw.


He was also in a pool in a suit like a rockstar.
And now he is promoting G-Star RAW
Full Edit - G-Star RAW Spring/Summer 2014 Campaign - The Challenge (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnZF8NjD5-Y#ws)
That advert is pretty cool
Title: Fischers Random Chess vs Stockfish 4
Post by: Tiwaking! on March 31, 2014, 06:40:51 pm
After getting my arse handed to me constantly at Fischers Random Chess by Stockfish level 4
YES!! I finally managed to beat the computer. I was playing as Black
http://sa.lichess.org/9E3f4tQI/black (http://sa.lichess.org/9E3f4tQI/black)
It got very grindy at the end, and there were some moves I played that I couldnt fully understand. But it worked out in the end
Title: Computer Chess Engine Ratings
Post by: Tiwaking! on May 16, 2014, 05:08:49 pm
To anyone interested, here is a list of almost all Computer Chess Engines (Missing is Deep Blue which is rated 2750) and their ELO Chess Ratings
http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/index.html (http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/index.html)

NagaSkaki 5.12, the chess engine on my computer, is rated 2166. I am surprised I can beat it sometimes!
Title: Magnus Carlsen retains Chess Crown
Post by: Tiwaking! on November 24, 2014, 06:40:09 pm
Well it looks like Magnus Carlsen has retained his chess world crown!
http://www.businessinsider.com.au/an-almost-unbeatable-magnus-carlsen-defends-his-title-as-world-chess-champion-2014-11 (http://www.businessinsider.com.au/an-almost-unbeatable-magnus-carlsen-defends-his-title-as-world-chess-champion-2014-11)
(http://static.businessinsider.com/image/547264baecad04713acefe59-1200/image.jpg)
Quote
Magnus Carlsen successfully defended his title as World Chess Champion on Sunday. He defeated Challenger Viswanathan Anand in Game 11 of a 12-game match to achieve the 6.5 points needed to claim victory.

Anand really went for it, attempting a dramatic sacrificial strategy when playing with the black pieces. It was a fitting end to a rematch of the 2013 WCC, when Carlsen ended Anand’s 5-time reign as champion

You can find all the games with an excellent analysis by Grand Master Daniel King here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjIQoU-96Xw&list=UUMBATpFb--uLNAODOVWvCTA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjIQoU-96Xw&list=UUMBATpFb--uLNAODOVWvCTA)
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Apostrophe Spacemonkey on November 24, 2014, 09:20:56 pm
I could beat him.


I'm just to busy.
Title: Random Computer Chess
Post by: Tiwaking! on January 30, 2015, 03:44:27 pm
If you're looking for a game of chess but dont want to play against a human and dont want to lose against a computer, you can try playing against a random computer!
http://chessboardjs.com/examples#5001 (http://chessboardjs.com/examples#5001)

It is quite hilarious
Title: Re: Random Computer Chess
Post by: Apostrophe Spacemonkey on January 30, 2015, 08:15:17 pm
If you're looking for a game of chess but dont want to play against a human and dont want to lose against a computer, you can try playing against a random computer!
[url]http://chessboardjs.com/examples#5001[/url] ([url]http://chessboardjs.com/examples#5001[/url])

It is quite hilarious


Ha, owned him.

I like this, it makes me feel actually good at something.

Title: Chess Toilet Variation 2
Post by: Tiwaking! on April 15, 2015, 10:33:46 am
Chess cheat caught - Georgian Chess Champion owes it to the iPhone
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11432849 (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11432849)
Quote
A chess grandmaster has been thrown out of an international tournament and faces a 15-year ban after he was caught sneaking to the toilet to check moves on his mobile phone.

Gaioz Nigalidze, the current Georgian champion, was expelled from the Dubai Open Chess tournament when he was found using his phone in the middle of a match.

The two-time national champion was exposed when his opponent lodged a complaint when he grew suspicious about his frequent trips to the lavatory.

Tournament organisers found Nigalidze had stored a mobile phone in a cubicle, covered in toilet paper.

The weirdest thing is the Armenian player who reported him is called "Tigran Petrosian".
Title: Casual Chess Club
Post by: Tiwaking! on August 28, 2015, 01:43:01 pm
I went to London and there's this shop on Baker St. (other than the Sherlock Holmes Museum), completely dedicated to Chess, card games & a few other classics (like backgammon). I think you would have really liked it Tiwa.

This one:
[url]http://shop.chess.co.uk/Visit-Shop-s/1885.htm[/url] ([url]http://shop.chess.co.uk/Visit-Shop-s/1885.htm[/url])

Lots of cool sets. But oddly they don't seem to be in their online shop that I saw.
Apparently there is a cafe chess club place in London where you can go to play called Casual Chess Club.

http://casualchess.org/ (http://casualchess.org/)
Quote
Finally, London has a real life chess cafe! You’ll find us in The BFI Lobby, 21 Stephen St, Off Tottenham Court Rd, W1T 1LN (nearest tube Tottenham Court Rd), every day 5.30pm – 10pm (closed Sundays). Free chess sets and clocks, for friendly games of chess in a relaxed, chatty atmosphere.

Choose your own time control and grab a coffee or a glass of wine. Join our Facebook group to hear about special events and news [url]https://www.facebook.com/groups/393548150795213/?fref=ts[/url] ([url]https://www.facebook.com/groups/393548150795213/?fref=ts[/url]) You can also use the group to arrange to meet a player of a similar level…or just come along any time Monday to Saturday 5.30pm – 10pm (closed Sundays) and play everyone. Boards and clocks provided.

It sounds like an okay place!
Title: Re: www.redhotpawn.com - safe for work - online chess
Post by: Pyromanik on September 05, 2015, 07:44:35 pm
Except it's in London (~300mi - yes, miles :< )

...

And I'm no good at chess :(


Does sound like a pretty cool place though!
Title: Google DeepMind Challenge Match 4
Post by: Tiwaking! on March 13, 2016, 09:51:06 pm
Good news everyone!

Lee Sedol beat AlphaGo in the Google DeepMind Challenge Match 4

Yay Humanity!!! :D
(https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-qNNVGIsd6Rs/VuUhuDDsHPI/AAAAAAAAGcE/0ty3V87xlv8/w893-h648-no/googledeep1.jpg)