Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - (BHP)Clyock

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Get Some Game Servers / Admin App for BF3
« on: April 06, 2013, 08:44:53 pm »
Hey guys I know I haven't been around for quite some time but I do play regularly with avariceNZ, we are in the same platoon [KC] (Kiwi Colonels),  I would be very happy to have him as an Admin if only for his awesome avatar!
My BF3 tag is 5curvy.

2
General Chat / Found a few more.
« on: October 26, 2007, 10:04:18 am »









3
General Chat / Random Images
« on: October 25, 2007, 09:50:34 am »
Like the eggs? Love the watermelons!












4
General Chat / Random Images
« on: October 25, 2007, 09:47:22 am »
These egg shells were cut with a high intensity precision Laser Beam. This
gives a very good idea of what can be achieved with a Laser Beam. From this can
be surmised what laser surgery performed on one's eye is all about. Is it any
wonder how one's vision can be improved in just a few moments?

 Incredible what can be done with an eggshell and a laser beam.












5
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: July 16, 2007, 08:55:35 pm »
Just saw Constantine for the first time last night, now that is religion you can sink your teeth into.

6
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: June 01, 2007, 12:31:21 am »
Quote from: Tiwaking!;441908
Pineapples


Wouldn't they chafe?:eek:

7
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 31, 2007, 05:45:24 pm »
You see I was thinking kumquats.....

http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/kumquat?view=uk


Must spread it about a bit first BH.

8
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 31, 2007, 01:37:27 pm »
Quote from: Spacemonkey;441165
I hate Brussell Sprouts, they are pure evil. Just the sight of them makes me physically sick, even as i type about them now i'm feeling queasy.

They are Satan's balls they are!


If that is true then God's testicles would be.........

9
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 31, 2007, 10:27:23 am »
Quote from: DEATH0WL;440936
Has this thread finally come to an end? After many thousand posts and many + and - rep's it has finally come down to this...Vegetables!


Are you upset that we are debating Gods existance through the miracale that is vegetables or that the vegetables are doing the debating?:confused:

10
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 30, 2007, 10:06:11 pm »
Quote from: Zarathrustra;440632
Pretty sure easy peel mandarins were an improvement on the original design, by hand of man. ;)


And they ARE called mandarins due to their place of origin just like chinese gosberries, which are devilishly :firedevil hard to peel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandarin_orange  :heheh:


:jester:

11
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 30, 2007, 12:51:12 pm »
Quote from: ThaFleastyler;440302
I think easy-peeling mandarins are the REALLY UNDENIABLE proof that God exists.


Actually i think easy peel mandarins are a product of cross breeding Chinese bhuddists.:asian::jester:

12
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 29, 2007, 11:04:17 pm »
Quote from: TuataraDude;439842
The worst thing is, I posted it to add a bit of humour to the debate, but that guy is serious about it.

The worst thing is that monkeys open them from the other end. Maybe it's our interpretation of the banana that is incorrect.

I've seen this guy before talking about Giraffes and how they are proof of God as only he could have designed them and no way could they have evolved.

13
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 23, 2007, 12:06:43 pm »
Quote from: ThaFleastyler;432733
Because it would influence free will?

I don't think I understood the question :sly:

If you are attributing all knowledge and discovery to God (re:doctors) why did he not allow his message to be prevelant from the begining. That is, why go through the pretence of multi-diety worship, why not show himself (send Jesus to earth earlier) and have Christianity as the main religion from day one?

In this way all the knowledge gained by  ancient cultures would have been availible for all time and not lost due to its source. Many medical practices were lost due to thier roots in "paganism", imagine the Dark Ages with all the Greek knowledge inplace. The plague would not have had the same effect for a start.

14
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 23, 2007, 09:48:41 am »
Quote from: ThaFleastyler;431833
(And as I mentioned already, God invented the doctors who made the prosthetics, and He made the scientists who are now working on human tissue regeneration techniques. 'Sif Satan or any scientist would give a crap about you and your missing leg without the compassionate side of God that was put into them.)

Hold on here, doesn't most of our scientific (include medical) practices stem from early Greek period methods? You know Hippocrites etc.. and these guys pre-dated any single God entity and infact owed their inspiration to Appolo et al.

So are you saying at a time where God, (in the eyes of the worlds inhabitants), didn't exist he was infact moving the humans around to discover these ideas but later in time when he did exist,(in the eyes of the worlds inhabitants), his followers outlawed many of these practices (that He inspired) as withcraft and devil worship to the point where they would drill a hole in someones head to let the demons out instead of waiting for the headache to go away.

So my question is : Why not reveal His existance at the time of the original concepts so it would all be seen as His work and save us from wandering around with holes in our heads?

15
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 20, 2007, 11:14:58 am »
Quote from: Black Heart;429320
oh great i can see it now christian vs muslim global war... i'm pretty sure the aetheists aren't going to win.


Isn't that the final war fortold in Armegeddon?

16
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 03, 2007, 05:52:50 pm »
I love lemon-lime.!

17
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 02, 2007, 11:56:44 pm »
Quote from: TuataraDude;410004
Just so I don't appear too idiotic, when talking about "JC", do we mean John Cleese or Jeremy Clarkson?


Julian Cleary!

Nice to see you got your pussy moving.:chuckle:

18
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 02, 2007, 11:54:59 pm »
Quote from: Tiwaking!;409996
What isnt clear about that?

This.

Quote
In Christianity, the doctrine of the Trinity states that God is one being who exists, simultaneously and eternally, as a mutual indwelling of three persons: the Father, the Son (incarnate as Jesus of Nazareth), and the Holy Spirit. Since the 4th century, in both Eastern and Western Christianity, this doctrine has been stated as "three persons in one God," all three of whom, as distinct and co-eternal persons, are of one indivisible Divine essence, a simple being. Supporting the doctrine of the Trinity is known as Trinitarianism. The majority of Christians are Trinitarian, and regard belief in the Trinity as a test of orthodoxy. Opposing, nontrinitarian positions that are held by some groups include Binitarianism (two deities/persons/aspects), Unitarianism (one deity/person/aspect), the Godhead (Latter Day Saints) (three separate beings) and Modalism (Oneness).

And this.

Quote
In addition to teaching that God comprises three persons, the doctrine also teaches that the Son Himself has two distinct natures, one fully divine and the other fully human.

Neither the Old Testament nor New Testament uses the term "Trinity," though Trinitarians believe the concept is implicit in various biblical passages (see Scripture section below). The doctrine of the Trinity is the result of continuous exploration by the church of the biblical data, argued in debate and treatises.[1] It was expressed in early writings from the beginning of the second century forward.[1] The First Council of Nicaea in 325 AD established a nearly universal Trinitarian dogma and expressly rejected any heresies. The most widely recognized Biblical foundations for the doctrine's formulation are in the Gospel of John.[2]

19
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 02, 2007, 10:45:28 pm »
Quote from: Tiwaking!;409899
Incorrect

Genesis 1:2. And the earth was void and empty, and darkness was upon the face
of the deep; and the spirit of God moved over the waters.

Holy spirit = God = Jesus Christ, the blessed trinity


Aren't the Holy Trinity considered seperate entities by some and not by others isn't that what one of those schismy things is about?
JC's physical manifestation was long after the Flood story/myth infact wasn't the Holy Trinity created much much later?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity

Just asking you know, far be it from me to say you might have made a boo boo.

I look forward to my illumination and spanking.

20
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 02, 2007, 09:03:55 pm »
Quote from: 'frog.;409259
its interesting to note that if you were to cross reference what the ancient
mythologys say, we see they were all talking about the same thing.
a great deluge/cataclysm
were our great civilizations just babbling fools? is there evidence for this event?

Mesopotamian texts, the book of Taliesin (Welsh), the Mythologys of the Navajo Inian, the Zen Avesta (persains), the Norse Edda, the Kato, Washington, Zuni, Hopi and Utes Indians, Chinese legneds, the Miztecs of South America just to name a few talk about this deluge.

I think the thing with this story\myth is that they are all many years seperate from each other, 1,000's in the case of Gilgamesh and Noah so they can hardly be the same story.

To look for an explanation how's this- All early civs would have located close to water sources and they would have been used to seeing floods of various sizes, the destruction that came with them and then the rebirth that would follow. It's quite easy to see how this could have developed into the stories we see now, a great cleansing flood destroying wickedness etc then after the land is restored to its pristene glory.


Just a thought.

21
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 02, 2007, 12:54:07 pm »
Quote from: cobra;409040
But if the ark was sealed with jesus's love it could float


Wasn't the flood before JC put in an appearence?

22
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 02, 2007, 08:49:28 am »
Many civilisations have a "Great Flood" myth as part of thier history, it's just another case of the Bible\Christians co-opting stories from elswhere to perpetuate thier own beliefs\ideaologies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deluge_(mythology)

23
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: May 01, 2007, 11:39:55 am »
Quote from: cobra;407862
well - there is no proof that cats didn't create the universe - it makes you think


It was the mice wasn't it?

24
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: April 27, 2007, 12:27:27 am »
Quote from: Sonic-NZ;403029
He died, came back to life and then ascended to heaven.  There will be a rapture where he comes and takes the believers and leaves behind the non-believers.


I saw a program on Discovery the other day about miricles acredited to Jesus and a Professor of Religious studies at Yale was saying that most religious scholars these days believe the tale of the ressurection is noting more than that, a tale. A metaphorical rising showing how Peter rose up the other apostles to go and spread the story of Jesus.

25
General Chat / RELIGION VS SCIENCE:The Ultimate Battle Thread
« on: April 26, 2007, 01:22:45 am »
Wasn't it the VORLONs that put us here? Visited from time to time to make sure all was going well, if not do a bit of smiting and then move on?

Pages: [1] 2 3